• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleOct. 3, 2025, 11:45 PM EDTBy Didi Martinez, Laura Strickler and Julia AinsleyThe federal government is offering unaccompanied migrant children 14 and older $2,500 to leave the United States of their own volition, or “self-deport” back to their countries, according to a memo sent by the Department of Health and Human Services and obtained by NBC News.The notice was sent Friday afternoon to legal service providers around the country that represent unaccompanied migrant children. Eligible children are those who are from countries other than Mexico and who are currently in the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), which is part of HHS.“This benefit is intended to support reintegration efforts following departures,” the notice reads. The notice also says that the Department of Homeland Security, which is issuing the stipends, has already identified unaccompanied children in ORR custody who have said they want to file or who will file “for voluntary departure.”Health and Human Services referred all queries to the Department of Homeland Security. The effort to entice minors to self-deport emerged as a rumor on social media Thursday night among immigrant advocates who said they had heard Immigration and Customs Enforcement was labeling the operation “Freaky Friday.” ICE said the name was a made up “ridiculous term” but conceded the agency was offering money to unaccompanied minor children to self deport.Emily Covington, the assistant director of ICE’s Office of Public Affairs, said in a statement that the offer from the federal government was a “strictly voluntary option to return home to their families.”Covington said that the option gives unaccompanied children “a choice and allows them to make an informed decision about their future. Any payment to support a return home would be provided after an immigration judge grants the request and the individual arrives in their country of origin.”The move alarmed immigration advocates around the country.Wendy Young with Kids in Need of Defense said in a statement, “Unaccompanied children should never be removed from the United States without a full and fair process to determine if they are eligible for U.S. protection.”“This operation undermines laws that guarantee that process for unaccompanied children, and it runs counter to our nation’s longstanding commitment to protect the most vulnerable among us — children — from violence, trafficking, abuse, persecution, and other grave dangers,” she continued.Roxana Cortés-Mills, who runs the Center for Immigrant and Refugee Advancement in Nebraska, said regardless of the offer, the rumors about it had sowed fear among immigrant communities. She said a rural school district in the state called her office asking, “should we tell parents to pull their kids from school?” She added, “This is the first time in my nine years of working with unaccompanied children that I am hearing this type of offer.” In Houston, Dalia Castillo-Granados, director of Children’s Immigration Law Academy, said offering money to children “raises many concerns given the vulnerable position these children are in.”The Trump administration offer comes amid an overall push to get undocumented immigrants to self-deport, offering adults and their families $1,000 to leave the country under a separate program. Over Labor Day weekend, the administration also tried to deport several unaccompanied children back to their home country of Guatemala but was temporarily blocked from doing so following court proceedings as DHS was loading the children on planes.“We are seeing a lot of patterns and receiving a lot of reports that ICE is using a lot of pressure tactics to encourage people to take deportation. It’s bad enough to use these tactics on adults to encourage them to self deport but it’s a whole new level of concern to try to use it with children,” Vanessa Dojaquez-Torres, practice and policy counsel with the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said about Friday’s news. More than 300,000 children entered the U.S. by themselves during the Biden administration before being released to parents, relatives or non-family sponsors across the country. As of August, the federal government had 2,011 unaccompanied minor children in its custody, according to the HHS website. Typically, children who cross the border without a legal parent or guardian are transferred temporarily to HHS custody until they can be matched with a U.S.-based sponsor. Children who immigrate to the United States without parents have special protections under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, unless they are from Mexico or Canada. The Trump administration has sought to thwart those special protections and recently attempted to deport Guatemalan children who were still in the process of seeking asylum. Though they have special protections to ensure they are screened for possible trafficking, unaccompanied children who crossed the border illegally have been previously deported, including under Democratic administrations. But incentivizing children to leave through financial plans has never been done before.Under the Biden administration, unaccompanied minors crossing the border surged to record numbers in 2021, causing backlogs at Health and Human Services as the agency struggled to place them with appropriate sponsors. The Trump administration has said many of those children were placed in unsafe environments where they could be abused or exploited for labor. Didi MartinezDidi Martinez is a producer for NBC News’ national security unit.Laura StricklerLaura Strickler is the senior investigative producer on the national security team where she produces television stories and writes for NBCNews.com.Julia AinsleyI am NBC News’ Senior Homeland Security Correspondent.

admin - Latest News - October 4, 2025
admin
25 views 19 secs 0 Comments




The federal government is offering unaccompanied migrant children 14 and older $2,500 to self-deport back to their countries, according to a memo sent by the Department of Health and Human Services and obtained by NBC News.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Feral hogs roam Texas apartment complex
NEXT
Oct. 3, 2025, 8:33 PM EDTBy Gary Grumbach and Dareh GregorianA federal judge on Friday ordered a hearing into whether the criminal case against Kilmar Abrego Garcia was the result of a “vindictive” prosecution, finding there’s “some evidence” that it was.In his 16-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw in Tennessee noted that the investigation into Abrego was reopened shortly after he successfully challenged to the U.S. Supreme Court what the Trump administration acknowledged was his mistaken deportation to a prison in El Salvador.The investigation also came after numerous administration officials, including Attorney General Pam Bondi and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, repeatedly accused Abrego of being guilty of numerous crimes, and being a “gang member” and a “terrorist.” His lawyers and family members have repeatedly denied the claims.”Actual vindictiveness may be apparent based on the Executive Official Defendants’ and their subordinates’ statements about Abrego from the time he filed his Maryland lawsuit” challenging his deportation “through his arrest in this District,” the judge wrote.In his ruling granting Abrego’s request for a hearing on the vindictive prosecution claims, Crenshaw focused on comments that Bondi’s top deputy, Todd Blanche, made on Fox News the day of his June arrest on human trafficking charges, to which Abrego pleaded not guilty.”Strikingly, during a television interview Deputy Attorney General Blanche revealed that the government started ‘investigating’ Abrego after ‘a judge in Maryland . . . questioned’ the government’s decision, found that it ‘had no right to deport him,’ and ‘accus[ed] [the government] of doing something wrong,’” the judge wrote.“Deputy Attorney General Blanche’s remarkable statements,” Crenshaw wrote, “could directly establish that the motivations for Abrego’s criminal charges stem from his exercise of his constitutional and statutory rights to bring suit against the Executive Official Defendants, rather than a genuine desire to prosecute him for alleged criminal misconduct.”Watch: Kilmar Abrego Garcia reunites with family after release from federal custody01:13The judge, nominated to the bench by President Barack Obama, said Abrego’s claims also appear to be supported by the timing of the reopening of the criminal investigation, which had started as the result of a traffic stop in 2022 and was deemed to be closed in March of this year, before Abrego was deported. Abrego was released without charges after the 2022 stop.The investigation was reopened a week after Abrego’s win in the Supreme Court in April.”This timeline suggests that Abrego’s prosecution may stem from retaliation by the DOJ and DHS due to Abrego’s successful challenge of his unlawful deportation in Maryland,” the judge wrote.The judge ordered the government to turn over information and evidence being requested by Abrego and said he’ll hold a hearing after that.”After the parties conduct discovery, ‘[i]t may well be that no fire will be discovered under all the smoke[.]’ Indeed, the Government could produce evidence showing legitimate reasons for its prosecution of Abrego that are unrelated to his case in the District of Maryland,” he wrote.Representatives for the Department of Homeland Security and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment Friday.Abrego, a Salvadoran national who, according to his lawyers, entered the U.S. illegally when he was 16 years old to escape gang violence, is trying to get the criminal charges against him dismissed.He also made a bid to reopen his petition for asylum, but an immigration judge rejected the request in a ruling Thursday. He has 30 days to appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals.A different immigration judge had previously ruled in 2019 that he could not be deported to El Salvador, because he faced danger from a gang that targeted his family. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is seeking to deport him to Uganda or Eswatini.Gary GrumbachGary Grumbach is an NBC News legal affairs reporter, based in Washington, D.C.Dareh GregorianDareh Gregorian is a politics reporter for NBC News.Raquel Coronell Uribe contributed.
Related Post
November 16, 2025
Good News: Boy reunites with football hero after heart transplant
November 25, 2025
Fans slam Met Gala after Bezos announced as lead sponsor
November 13, 2025
Nov. 13, 2025, 5:36 PM ESTBy Courtney Kube and Laura StricklerFORT HOOD, Texas — The commander of the Army medical center where a gynecologist who saw hundreds of service members and their spouses is accused of sexual misconduct said investigators continue to receive new allegations from patients.Col. Mark Jacques, the commander of Darnall Army Medical Center at Fort Hood military base, said in an interview with NBC News that he sent a letter to more than 1,400 of the gynecologist’s patients to inform them of the probe and created a hotline for them to call to report complaints. As many as 85 patients have reached out to the Army Criminal Investigation Division, or CID, he said, although it’s not clear if all of them were victims of misconduct.Col. Mark Jacques, commander of Darnall Army Medical Center at Fort Hood, speaks with Courtney Kube.Mosheh Gains / NBC NewsAt least 30 women have been identified by Army investigators as having been photographed or videotaped by the gynecologist, according to a patient who was told of that number by investigators and two Army officials.“I’m devastated that these patients and their families have to endure this and have to go through this,” Jacques said.The gynecologist, Dr. Blaine McGraw, is named in a lawsuit filed on Monday by one of his former patients under the name Jane Doe to protect her identity, NBC News reported. The lawsuit accuses McGraw of recording intimate videos of a patient without her knowledge and alleges there are scores of other women who are victims of his misconduct. It also says Army leadership received complaints about sexual misconduct by McGraw dating back years and allowed him to continue practicing.Jacques said he was not aware of any such complaints or concerns since he took command of the medical center in June.Daniel Conway, an attorney for McGraw, said in a statement, “Dr. McGraw is fully cooperative with the investigation. We have reason to believe, however, that Army special agents are providing members of the public with inaccurate and exaggerated information. We can think of no other reason for inaccurate leaks than to influence the outcome of the case. We, nonetheless, remain cooperative.”Two women, whose names NBC News is withholding at their request, said they were both patients of McGraw’s and had not been interviewed by Army CID. One of them, who said she did not receive the letter from Jacques, said she fears her privacy may have been violated. “He might have pictures of me, and I don’t even know,” she said. The other woman said she received Jacques’ letter.NBC News has verified that McGraw was their doctor.Another one of McGraw’s patients, whom NBC News is calling “Erin” because she asked for anonymity due to the sensitivity of the case, said she received a call from Army criminal investigators on Oct. 28. Erin said she started seeing McGraw earlier this year for a high-risk pregnancy. She said Army investigators sent her a still image they had found on McGraw’s phone that they thought might be of her.Courtney Kube interviewing the Jane Doe who filed a lawsuit against the Army doctor.Mosheh Gains / NBC NewsShe said when she looked at the image, she recognized herself instantly. It was a snapshot of her during one of the most trying times of her life — she was in the intensive care unit at the Army hospital dealing with complications from her delivery, she said.“I was in the room by myself for that treatment, and he came in around 11 at night and was basically conversational — and he said, ‘I’ve got great news. We are sending you home early,’” the woman recounted. She said she was groggy from the medication she’d needed for the procedure when he asked how things were going. She told him breastfeeding was not going very well for her, at which point he asked to take a look, she said.What she didn’t know at the time, but realized as soon as she saw the image from Army investigators, was that McGraw had recorded his examination of her breasts, she said.During her interview with Army investigators, she said they told her that the images of patients on McGraw’s phone went back to February 2025.Jacques said he learned on Oct. 17 that a patient had made allegations. The gynecologist was immediately suspended and stripped of his access to any patient treatment areas and electronic medical records, and the Army opened a criminal investigation that same day, he said.“Everything we do in this organization, the reason people come to work every day, is to take care of patients, to take care of Army soldiers, their families and the community,” Jacques said. “Those allegations were not in line with that. They were opposed to the safe treatment of patients, how we take care of patients with respect. And as a result, the investigation is ongoing.”The letter Jacques sent to 1,400 patients, which was obtained by NBC News, includes a QR code to access a questionnaire from Army CID.“We are writing to inform you of an investigation involving a healthcare provider who has previously provided Gynecological and Obstetric care at Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center,” the letter states. “While your name appears on the list of patients seen by this provider, there are currently no indications you were affected by the alleged misconduct currently under review.”The lawsuit filed on Monday said the plaintiff learned from Army investigators that McGraw had secretly recorded her during breast and pelvic examinations.The lawsuit also accuses McGraw of inappropriate touching, crude remarks and performing unnecessary medical procedures on multiple patients. It also alleges he would call his patients at home to discuss matters unrelated to medical care and dismiss female chaperones in examination rooms, raising questions about whether he had informed his patients they have a right to have a chaperone present during an appointment.“These allegations that were raised are not in line with me as a physician or with me as a soldier who lives by the Army values,” Jacques said. “This is not acceptable, and that’s why, as the commander, I take responsibility to ensure that, moving forward, we cover every area and every basis to ensure that this doesn’t happen again.”Courtney KubeCourtney Kube is a correspondent covering national security and the military for the NBC News Investigative Unit.Laura StricklerLaura Strickler is the senior investigative producer on the national security team where she produces television stories and writes for NBCNews.com.Mosheh Gains contributed.
October 9, 2025
Hostage's parents react to ceasefire agreement
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved