• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Sept. 26, 2025, 11:24 AM EDTBy Rob Wile and Steve KopackAnalysts are already warning that U.S. consumers could see higher prices due to new tariffs President Donald Trump plans to impose on drug product imports as soon as next week.But a series of exemptions may blunt the ultimate impact. In a Truth Social post late Thursday, Trump said that any branded or patented pharmaceutical products brought into the U.S. would face a 100% tariff starting Oct. 1.U.S. imports of pharmaceuticals totaled about $213 billion in 2024, a threefold increase from a decade earlier, according to data from the United Nations Comtrade Database.With Asia alone accounting for just over 20% of those imports by value, U.S. consumers could see a “meaningful commercial hit,” Louise Loo, head of Asia economics at Oxford Economics research group, said in a note to clients. Previous studies have shown that U.S. annual spending per capita on prescription drugs is about double the rest of the developed world. In July, Trump announced a plan to “get Americans the best prices in the world for prescription drugs” that involved asking major drugmakers to match low prices they offer elsewhere in the world. However, it is not clear what actions the pharma firms have taken to begin addressing that demand. The pharmaceutical industry is already warning that the new tariffs could derail further drug development while also raising prices. “Every dollar spent on tariffs is a dollar that cannot be invested in American manufacturing or the development of future treatments and cures,” Alex Schriver, senior vice president for PhRMA, the drug industry’s primary lobbying group, said in a statement. “Medicines have historically been exempt from tariffs because they raise costs and could lead to shortages.”Despite those warnings, a significant share of drug products could wind up being exempted from the new import duties. The tariffs do not appear to apply to so-called generic drugs, which account for 9 out of 10 prescriptions filled in the U.S., according to the Food and Drug Administration. The White House did not immediately respond to a request to confirm the exemption for generics, but assuming they will remain tariff-free, the impact to consumers could be more limited than feared. Trump also specified that any drug companies that currently have, or have committed to building, U.S.-based drug-making facilities would be exempted from tariffs. That’s a category that includes numerous major drugmakers. “Many pharmaceutical companies have facilities in the U.S., so it may be relatively easy to superficially expand those facilities to avoid tariffs being applied,” Paul Donovan, chief global economist at UBS Global Wealth Management, wrote in a note to clients. Analysts at JPMorgan agreed: “While there remains very limited details, we note that this will likely lead to a majority of pharma products being excluded from any tariffs” because most major companies have recently increased or have started to increase their U.S. manufacturing facilities.On the White House website, the administration maintains a “running list of new U.S. investment” from private companies. At least 15 pharmaceutical or drug makers are listed with investments ranging from new manufacturing facilities, tens of billions in expanded U.S. production and increased R&D spending. Many of those announcements would appear to meet the requirements laid out by Trump to avoid the new tariff.Two major European drugmakers, Roche and Novartis, said in statements that they expected little to no impact from the newly announced duties. “We are working to ensure that all major Novartis medicines for U.S. patients are manufactured in the U.S.,” Novartis said in a statement. “The announced 100% tariff should not have an impact.” Roche pointed to ongoing factory construction in the U.S., with multiple sites being expanded and upgraded in Kentucky, Indiana, New Jersey and California.Trump has signaled since at least April that drug imports would face tariffs. In anticipation, major drugmakers have indicated they have been stockpiling supplies, analysts said. As a result, consumers are unlikely to feel immediate effects even though the tariffs are set to kick in next week. “We think there may have been significant inventory accumulation this year,” Neil Shearing, group chief economist with Capital Economics, said in a note. This summer, Trump placed a maximum 15% tariff on most pharmaceuticals coming in from the European Union, which accounts for 60% of drugs imported by the U.S. E.U. officials believe that this agreement will shield it from the 100% duties, though they said they could not be certain. “This clear all-inclusive 15% tariff ceiling for E.U. exports represents an insurance policy that no higher tariffs will emerge for European economic operators,” a European Commission spokesperson told NBC News on Friday.Ireland’s deputy prime minister, Simon Harris, who also acts as trade minister, said his country is “studying the impact of this announcement” but added that he believed the 15% cap on pharma tariffs remained in place. Ireland alone accounts for 24% of pharma imports to the U.S.Rob WileRob Wile is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist covering breaking business stories for NBCNews.com.Steve KopackSteve Kopack is a senior reporter at NBC News covering business and the economy.

admin - Latest News - September 26, 2025
admin
27 views 17 secs 0 Comments




Analysts are already warning that U.S. consumers could see higher prices due to new tariffs President Donald Trump plans to impose on drug product imports as soon as next week



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Theo Von slams DHS for using his clip in agency post
NEXT
Trump on indictments after Comey
Related Post
November 21, 2025
Federal guidelines to require car companies to use female crash test dummies
November 11, 2025
Car explosion in India leaves at least eight dead
October 17, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleOct. 17, 2025, 5:33 PM EDTBy Steve Kopack and Dareh GregorianMore than 7,200 federal workers filed initial jobless claims last week, according to data posted on an obscure Labor Department website.The site shows 7,224 federal workers filed claims with the Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees program for the week ending October 11. The numbers, which were first reported by Bloomberg News, are released on a one-week delay.According to the program’s fact sheet, “The UCFE program provides unemployment compensation for Federal employees who lost their employment through no fault of their own.”The timing of the surge of claims lines up with the first full week of the government shutdown and the Trump administration’s announcement of layoffs at numerous government agencies. Data shows there were about 3,300 claims the preceding week, when the shutdown began. For the week ending Sept. 26 there were about 600 claims.White House budget director Russ Vought told The Charlie Kirk Show this week that more than 10,000 employees could have their jobs eliminated in “reduction in force” actions. Trump told reporters last week there “will be a lot” of job cuts “and it will be Democrat oriented because we figured, you know, they started this thing.”A federal judge in California on Wednesday issued a temporary restraining order barring the layoffs from continuing.U.S. District Judge Susan Yvonne Illston said the way the layoffs were being carried out were “contrary to laws.”The judge said the administration had “taken advantage of the lapse in government spending and government functioning to assume that all bets are off, the laws don’t apply to them anymore, and they can impose the structures that they like on the government situation that they don’t like.” In her ruling, Illston noted that some employees might not even know they’ve been laid off because “the RIF notices were sent to government e-mail accounts, and furloughed employees may not access their work e-mail during a shutdown.” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday that the president “does have the ability and the legal authority to fire people from the federal government” and that Illston, a Clinton nominee, “is another far left partisan judge.””We are 100% confident we will win this on the merit,” Leavitt said. Steve KopackSteve Kopack is a senior reporter at NBC News covering business and the economy.Dareh GregorianDareh Gregorian is a politics reporter for NBC News.
October 1, 2025
What happens next after government shutdown?
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved