• Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or…
  • Oct. 11, 2025, 8:00 AM EDTBy Alicia Victoria…
  • Palestinians Begin Return Home As Ceasefire Takes Effect
  • Oct. 11, 2025, 8:48 AM EDT / Updated Oct. 11, 2025,…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Sept. 30, 2025, 1:42 PM EDT / Updated Sept. 30, 2025, 3:12 PM EDTBy Matt Lavietes and Saba HamedyA major Hollywood actors’ union condemned reports that talent agents are looking to sign AI “actor” Tilly Norwood for representation. The Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, or SAG-AFTRA, said in a statement Tuesday that Tilly Norwood “is not an actor, it’s a character generated by a computer program that was trained on the work of countless professional performers.””It has no life experience to draw from, no emotion and, from what we’ve seen, audiences aren’t interested in watching computer-generated content untethered from the human experience,” the union said. The union blasted the AI creation for “using stolen performances to put actors out of work, jeopardizing performer livelihoods and devaluing human artistry.”SAG-AFTRA added that Hollywood producers “should be aware that they may not use synthetic performers without complying with our contractual obligations, which generally require notice and bargaining whenever a synthetic performer is going to be used,” it added.Tilly Norwood was made by the AI company Particle6 Productions, led by comedian and writer Eline Van der Velden, who announced on Saturday at the Zurich Film Festival that several talent agencies were looking to cast the AI creation in various films and shows, prompting a wave of outrage in Hollywood. Actors, including Emily Blunt, Lukas Gage, Melissa Barrera and Kiersey Clemons, have slammed the AI creation. On Monday, EGOT winner Whoopi Goldberg opened an episode of “The View” slamming it.”It’s a little bit of an unfair advantage. But you know what? Bring it on,” she said. “Because you can always tell them from us.”Meet Tilly Norwood, an AI Actress Causing a Stir in Hollywood03:06Van der Velden pushed back on the criticism on Sunday, writing in a statement on Instagram that she sees “AI not as a replacement for people, but as a tool — a new paintbrush.””AI characters should be judged as part of their own genre, on their own merits, rather than compared directly with human actors,” she wrote. “Each form of art has its place, and each can be valued for what it uniquely brings.”Van der Velden’s company, Particle6, did not immediately return a request for comment on the union’s statement. As part of a landmark deal between SAG-AFTRA and major Hollywood studios in 2023 — following a strike that lasted more than 100 days — the union and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers meet twice a year to make sure they are complying with federal regulations of AI as it continues to evolve.At The Grill, an entertainment conference in Los Angeles hosted by The Wrap on Tuesday, speakers on AI-focused panels were asked about Tilly Norwood and whether the notion of a digital actor should be taken seriously.Yves Bergquist, director of AI in media at USC’s Entertainment Technology Center, said it was “nonsense.”“AI music has been a possibility for years and years and years, and we don’t have any major AI artists out there,” he said during a panel titled “From Ideation to Innovation: AI In the Studio Pipeline.” “I think it’s a gimmick … are there going to be digital characters in certain films down the road? Yeah of course,” Bergquist said. “Are there actually going to be talent that’s digital? … No, and boo.”Matt LavietesMatt Lavietes is a reporter for NBC News.Saba HamedySaba Hamedy is the trends and culture editor for NBC News.Lindsay Good contributed.

admin - Latest News - October 1, 2025
admin
12 views 12 secs 0 Comments




A major Hollywood actors’ union condemned reports that talent agents are looking to sign AI “actor” Tilly Norwood for representation.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Sept. 30, 2025, 8:49 PM EDTBy Monica Alba and Raquel Coronell UribeWASHINGTON — National parks will remain partially open during the government shutdown set to begin Wednesday, according to an Interior Department contingency plan posted Tuesday evening.Open-air sites will remain open to the public, but buildings that require staffing, such as visitor centers or sites like the Washington Monument, will be closed. Health and safety will continue to be addressed for sites that remain operational, meaning restrooms will be open and trash will be collected, the Interior Department said.The contingency plans specify that park roads, lookouts, trails and open-air memorials will stay open but emergency services will be limited. The department added that if public access begins to pose a safety, health or resource protection issue, an area must close.Critical Senate vote fails as shutdown deadline looms02:02The contingency plan says that about 64% of the National Park Service workforce is set to be furloughed and that those kept on would perform “excepted” activities, such as law enforcement or emergency response, border and coastal protection and surveillance, and fire suppression and monitoring.The published plans come hours before a funding lapse across the federal government. Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought told agencies in a memo Tuesday night to begin implementing their shutdown plans.Recent shutdowns led to confusion about the public’s access to national parks. During the last shutdown, in his first term, President Donald Trump ordered parks to remain open. Trails and outdoor sites stayed open ,and some staff members stayed on to clean restrooms and empty trash cans.Still, many park employees were furloughed, resulting in trash piling up and restrooms filling up with human waste. Some parks, including California’s Joshua Tree, eventually had to close because of damage made by unsupervised visitors.That shutdown was the longest in U.S. history, lasting 34 days.During the 2013 shutdown, the park service took a different approach to park access. At the time, park gates were closed and bathrooms were locked. Trash went uncollected, and fencing went up around some sites, like the Lincoln Memorial.In both shutdowns, there was more notice about the plan, whereas the contingency plans published Tuesday night came just hours before a shutdown.The park service workforce, which could experience significant furloughs, is already more depleted than usual. The National Parks Conservation Association, an advocacy organization, estimated in July that the park service lost 24% of its permanent staff as a consequence of the Trump administration’s efforts to reduce the federal workforce through the Department of Government Efficiency.The park service reinstated a number of purged employees, however, The Associated Press reported this month.The park service did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday night on the number of job cuts and how many people were rehired.The National Parks Conservation Association said Monday that the impacts of keeping parks open last time were “disastrous” and that some parks suffered damage that took months or even years to recover from.“A government shutdown would leave our parks understaffed and vulnerable, putting our most cherished places and millions of visitors at risk. If a national park has a gate or door, it must be locked until a funding deal is reached and our parks can be staffed and protected,” it said in a news release.Meanwhile, a letter signed by more than 40 former park superintendents urged Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to close parks, too, arguing that keeping them open during past shutdowns caused harm to them and jeopardized visitor safety.“If you don’t act now, history is not just doomed to repeat itself, the damage could in fact be much worse,” the letter said.Monica AlbaMonica Alba is a White House correspondent for NBC News.Raquel Coronell UribeRaquel Coronell Uribe is a breaking news reporter. 
NEXT
Critical Senate vote fails as shutdown deadline looms
Related Post
September 24, 2025
Meet the contenders of Alaska's Fat Bear Week
October 5, 2025
Trump marks 250th anniversary of the Navy
September 28, 2025
Mexican Navy ship reopens after Brooklyn Bridge accident
October 1, 2025
Sept. 30, 2025, 12:04 PM EDTBy Kaan OzcanNew cases of cancer have been rising among younger people, worrying patients and doctors about causes. A new study suggests increasing numbers of cases of early onset cancer are largely due to improved and more routine screening, while mortality rates among younger people haven’t changed.The study, published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine, compared rates of new diagnoses over the past three decades to mortality rates of the fastest-rising cancers in adults under 50. Of the eight cancers the research team studied, only two, colorectal and endometrial, showed increases in deaths. Other cancers included thyroid, anal, pancreatic, kidney, myeloma and small intestine. While breast and kidney cancers have increased in incidence, the mortality rates across all age groups have decreased in recent years.In fact, invasive breast cancer has been increasing faster in women under 50 than women over 50, at around a 1.4% increase per year from 2012 to 2021, according to the American Cancer Society. Similarly, colorectal cancer rates increased 2.4% per year in adults under 50 years and by 0.4% in adults 50-64 from 2012 to 2021. However, deaths have been halved for both because of earlier detection and improved treatment such as immunotherapies.Advances in screening technology and recommended screening at younger ages have allowed doctors to detect tumors at their earliest stages, including cases that may not ever negatively affect a person’s health.Dr. H. Gilbert Welch, senior investigator at the Center for Surgery and Public Health at Mass General Brigham hospital and a co-author of the study, said the harder doctors look for cancer, the more they are bound to find. “There really isn’t much more cancer out there,” Welch said. “We’re just finding stuff that’s always been there. That’s particularly true in things like the thyroid and the kidney.”The increase in “diagnostic scrutiny” for cancer adds to the uptick in some cancer case numbers. “Largely, what’s going on here is that people are getting tested more, and they’re getting more, if you will, powerful tests that can resolve smaller and smaller abnormalities,” he said. “This is largely simply unearthing things that have always been there.”Last year, the highly influential U.S. Preventive Services Task Force lowered the recommended age for first breast cancer screenings to 40, down from 50. And as deaths from colon cancer among people ages 45 to 49 ticked up, in 2021 the recommended age to start screening dropped from 50 to 45. Dr. Ahmed Jemal, senior vice president for surveillance, prevention and health services research at the American Cancer Society, said rising incidence rates can’t simply be chalked up to more and improved screening. Some of the causes are diet, obesity and physical inactivity.The study also pointed out that unnecessary treatments, such as surgery or radiation or chemotherapy, for cancers that aren’t “clinically meaningful” can cause multiple burdens for younger patients, Jemal said. A clinically meaningful cancer is considered dangerous and could spread if it is untreated. “You create not only cost burden, but you create anxiety,” Jemal said. Dr. Philippe E. Spiess, chief of surgery at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida, said the psychosocial aspect of cancer is another significant consequence. “Once a patient physically knows they have a mass, there is a significant burden that you have related to knowing that,” he said.Rather than intervene with every cancer doctors find, Spiess said, it’s important for doctors to assess whether patients’ cancers are dangerous and at risk of harming them. If tumors are small enough to be considered nonlethal, doctors should work with patients to monitor and continually assess their risk.“As long as the patient is committed to observation and surveillance, I think the consideration there is that you’re really not losing anything,” Spiess said.Kaan OzcanKaan Ozcan is an intern with NBC News’ Health and Medical Unit. 
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved