• Police release video of possible Brown University shooter
  • Dec. 14, 2025, 12:42 AM ESTBy Phil Helsel…
  • Video of possible Brown University shooter released
  • Brown University victims believed to be students, school…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Skydiver dangles from plane after parachute gets tangled

admin - Latest News - December 12, 2025
admin
6 views 27 secs 0 Comments



Authorities in Australia have released their report on an incident involving a skydiver whose parachute inadvertently opened as he was about to jump. The video shows the unidentified man quickly cutting the cords to his back-up parachute to get safely to the ground. NBC News’ George Solis has the story.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Dec. 12, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Adam EdelmanWisconsin has quietly emerged as the latest front in the national redistricting fight — and a never-before-used legal process seems likely to determine the state’s congressional lines in the midterm election. The saga unfolding in the critical Midwestern battleground has the potential to put more districts in play for Democrats ahead of next year’s midterms. But unlike in other states that have redrawn their congressional maps mid-decade in recent months, the push toward a new map in Wisconsin is now hinging on a little-known law the GOP-controlled state Legislature enacted 14 years ago.Days before Thanksgiving, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ordered a pair of three-judge panels to oversee two lawsuits that allege that the state’s current congressional map is unconstitutional and seek a redraw. Both panels will meet for the first time Friday for initial hearings. And Friday’s opening moves are only the latest steps in a long, complex path. Earlier this year, the Wisconsin Supreme Court rejected a pair of suits seeking a redraw of the state’s eight congressional districts — the second time in as many years that the court had dismissed such an effort. Those decisions sparked surprise among many court-watchers in the state. Liberals had regained their majority on the technically nonpartisan bench in an expensive and headline-making election in 2023 and retained the majority in an even more expensive 2025 race. Many Democrats believed that it was only a matter of time before the high court’s liberal majority allowed a redistricting case against the state’s maps to move forward.But, in July, just two weeks after the state Supreme Court’s most recent rejection of the redistricting case, two parties filed fresh cases in Dane County Circuit Court — a lower state court — making the same arguments about the maps. Those cases effectively triggered a process created by state Republicans and signed into law by then-Republican Gov. Scott Walker in 2011, which requires the state Supreme Court to appoint a judicial panel to hear cases related to redistricting.In an 5-2 order issued Nov. 25, the state Supreme Court explained that it had utilized that process and assembled two panels — one to hear each congressional redistricting case. One conservative justice joined the court’s four liberals, touching off an unprecedented undertaking in the purple state.In interviews with NBC News, nonpartisan experts on Wisconsin law and legal processes explained that even though the process hadn’t been used before in Wisconsin, the notion of a panel of three judges drawn from different courts convening over a redistricting case wasn’t unusual. In fact, it was modeled after federal statues requiring that a similar panel be arranged to hear most redistricting cases.“Yes, it’s the first time a three-judge panel for a redistricting action has happened in Wisconsin state court. But a three-judge panel for redistricting challenges or Voting Rights Act challenges are what happens in federal court,” said Bree Grossi Wilde, the executive director of the nonpartisan State Democracy Research Initiative at the University of Wisconsin Law School. “This is how redistricting battles played out in federal court.”Grossi Wilde said that while she expected political criticism to mount, she emphasized that the process itself is not a novel solution created by a liberal-controlled Supreme Court.“This isn’t a procedure that the [state] Supreme Court crafted to meet this particular moment,” she said. “This is a legislative procedure that the Supreme Court is required to follow.”However, the process, the venue for the cases, and the accelerated timeline for review of these cases has led many court-watchers in Wisconsin to believe that there’s a high chance the state could have new maps in place before the midterms — and that they’d be all but certain to advantage Democrats compared to the current map, in which Republicans currently hold six of eight seats.But it still might be difficult to do in the allotted time: The filing window in Wisconsin for candidates running for Congress and other offices opens in April, with a June 1 deadline.“If you look at the judges on these panels, where they come from, who appointed them, it’s a biased panel. Call a spade a spade,” said Brandon Scholz, an independent political strategist in Wisconsin. “This is a partisan, political move by what’s supposed to be a nonpartisan court. It really seems like a push to have two partisan panels in place to determine redistricting on a congressional level.”One of the panels comprises three judges who all endorsed liberal Supreme Court Judge Susan Crawford during her campaign earlier this year. The other panel had two judges who endorsed Crawford.The process has already faced criticism from conservatives on the state Supreme Court and Republicans throughout the state. The court’s two conservative justices who opposed implementing the process in the latest order blasted the use of the panels in blistering opinions, specifically slamming their counterparts on the bench for picking the judges on them.“Today, my colleagues — disregarding the United States Constitution, the Wisconsin Constitution, and fundamental legal principles — approve a collateral attack of our court’s decision by a panel of circuit court judges, unsupported in the law,” conservative Justice Annette Ziegler wrote in an opinion.“Handpicking circuit court judges to perform political maneuvering is unimaginable,” she added. “Yet, my colleagues persist and appear to do this, all in furtherance of delivering partisan, political advantage to the Democratic Party.”Elected Republicans have criticized the court decision, too.”These folks care about one thing: power,” GOP Rep. Derrick Van Orden, whose 3rd District would likely be affected in a new map, posted on X after the ruling.In a statement to NBC News, Wisconsin Democratic Party Chair Devin Remiker accused the GOP of “throwing a temper tantrum because they lost their state Supreme Court majority, which had been vital in rigging the rules in the Republicans’ favor.””Now, Wisconsin Republicans are being forced to play in a far more fair and impartial system where they don’t have a judiciary to stack the deck for their candidates,” Remiker said.Attorneys challenging the current congressional map in one of the cases said that it was a normal legal course to try a suit with a lower court after being rejected by a state Supreme Court.“We followed the normal course — which is to bring a regular lawsuit in the lower court which is how often lawsuits typically proceed,” said Abha Khanna, an attorney with Democratic-aligned firm Elias Law Group, which filed one of the cases before a panel.But many political figures in the state see the current process as a counter to Republican efforts in states like Texas to gain seats in their own redistricting fights ahead of 2026.“There is a rush to change Wisconsin’s lines,” Scholz said. “And it’s because this has become a national story — everyone got all jazzed up over the summer. And the truth is there is a real opportunity for Democrats and for the liberals on the court, to possibly change those lines. So this is where we are.”Adam EdelmanAdam Edelman is a politics reporter for NBC News.
NEXT
Coast Guard rescues people stranded by Washington flood
Related Post
December 8, 2025
Olympic torch relay leaves Rome ahead of Winter Games
November 20, 2025
Leavitt clarifies Trump’s ‘punishable by death' post
September 25, 2025
Sept. 25, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Abigail Brooks and Erik OrtizDerrick Dearman appeared to be high on drugs in his Alabama prison in the days leading up to his execution.The convicted killer raged in phone calls and emails, anguishing over how his willingness to die for his crimes wouldn’t change the perception of him as an irredeemable monster.And by the time he took his final breath, his longtime addiction to methamphetamine — the drug he blamed for fueling the murders of five people, including a pregnant woman, in 2016 — had consumed him to the end.Dearman, 36, had meth in his body when Alabama put him to death by lethal injection in October 2024, according to a toxicology report confirming what eyewitnesses believed at the time.He isn’t the only prisoner to be executed with narcotics in their system in Alabama recently.Since Alabama resumed executions in 2023, following a pause on capital punishment amid a series of failed lethal injection attempts, the state has executed 11 people, including Dearman. An NBC News review of available autopsies shows that at least three others had taken illegal drugs prior to their executions: Jamie Ray Mills, 50, was executed last year with meth in his body, while Carey Dale Grayson, 50, and Kenneth Smith, 58, died last year with a form of a synthetic cannabinoid in their system, according to their toxicology reports. Synthetic cannabinoids imitate the effects of substances like marijuana.Carey Dale Grayson; Kenneth Smith; Jamie Ray Mills.Alabama Department of CorrectionsAlabama has its fourth execution of the year scheduled for Thursday.Jon Ozmint, a former prosecutor who was the director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections from 2003 to 2011, said that the discovery during autopsy of drugs unrelated to an execution and not prescribed to an inmate would have been “a red flag for us.”“We definitely would have launched an after-action review, and then, if there was any indication of you know, staff wrongdoing, we would have launched the appropriate level of investigation,” Ozmint said.Mills was executed by lethal injection, and Grayson and Smith died by an execution method using nitrogen gas. (Smith was the first inmate in the nation to die in that manner.)The amount of the drugs found in Dearman, Mills, Grayson and Smith was relatively small, independent medical experts who reviewed the inmates’ records told NBC News, but their detection still indicates the drugs had been recently absorbed.D’Michelle DuPre, a forensic consultant in South Carolina and a former medical examiner, has analyzed about 125 death row inmates’ toxicology reports throughout her career, she said.“I have rarely seen an opioid in the inmates’ tox screen. I don’t recall seeing a narcotic,” DuPre noted.Alabama executes convicted murderer with new nitrogen method02:05Charlotte Morrison, a senior attorney with the Equal Justice Initiative, which represented Mills in his death row case, said drugs are generally less of a problem in Alabama’s William C. Holman Correctional Facility because of heightened security and inmates’ isolation.However, she said, she’s not surprised to learn that even death row inmates can score drugs, indicating the depths of the problem.“The entire system is poorly managed,” Morrison said. Drugs “are a pervasive crisis.”The Alabama Department of Corrections and the state attorney general’s office did not immediately respond to inquiries about the inmates’ toxicology results.According to the state’s execution protocol, on the afternoon of an execution, “a medical examination of the condemned inmate will be completed, with the results recorded on a Medical Treatment Record or Body Chart.” The Department of Corrections also did not immediately respond when asked if workers are checking for drug use in that final examination and what happens if it is detected.In a deposition last October involving Grayson’s case, Corrections Commissioner John Hamm acknowledged drugs are circulating in Alabama’s prisons. He agreed that, in some instances, corrections employees may be smuggling the contraband into the prisons and selling them to prisoners.In recent months, the Department of Corrections said a corrections officer was accused of the large-scale trafficking of narcotics, including meth and marijuana, at the state prison in St. Clair County. Additionally, visitors have attempted to bring drugs into facilities, including at Holman, or used drones to drop backpacks containing drugs onto prison grounds.The William C. Holman Correctional Facility in Atmore, Ala., where death row inmates are executed.Sharon Steinmann / APThe drug trade has had lethal consequences, as well. Of the 277 deaths last year of inmates in state Department of Corrections custody, 46 were classified as “accidental/overdose,” according to an ACLU of Alabama report.In 2020, the Justice Department sued Alabama for alleged constitutional violations within its prison system, citing instances of excessive force, sexual abuse and poor sanitary conditions. The suit also mentioned the system’s “failure to prevent the introduction of illegal contraband leads to prisoner-on-prisoner violence.”“The use of illicit substances, including methamphetamines or fentanyl or synthetic cannabinoids, is prevalent in Alabama’s prison for men,” the complaint alleges. “Prisoners using illicit substances often harm others or become indebted to other prisoners.”The federal government’s lawsuit against Alabama remains ongoing, and the state has largely denied the allegations in court filings.Carla Crowder, the executive director of Alabama Appleseed, a nonprofit criminal justice reform organization that provides legal and re-entry services, said prison officials have the ability to root out drugs in prisons “from a public corruption perspective.”“Start tracking down the source — who’s in charge, who’s calling the shots,” Crowder said. “We are advocating for the state to begin to take this seriously.”During Commissioner Hamm’s deposition, one of Grayson’s lawyers pointed out the ability for some death row inmates to acquire drugs, including his own client — and questioned whether that affected Grayson’s ability to meaningfully participate in his own defense.“Mr. Grayson admitted that he was on drugs at the time of his deposition or had taken them in the immediate — in the preceding 12 hours,” lawyer Spencer Hahn told U.S. District Judge R. Austin Huffaker Jr.“I don’t understand how a person who is being held on single block at the most secure prison in the state of Alabama is allowed to alter his consciousness using drugs before a deposition that is central to his case,” Hahn said. “So a lot of what Mr. Grayson said and may not have said, he was not in his right mind in a lot of ways.”Hahn added that Grayson had been under the influence of flakka, a synthetic stimulant similar to the more commonly known bath salts.He said Grayson’s drug use was also consistent with a synthetic cannabinoid found in Smith’s autopsy. An attorney for the state responded that the synthetic cannabinoid Smith consumed was “smoked.”Certainly taking drugs is illegal, but so is providing drugs to a prisoner. ”Said Spencer hahn, a lawyer for a Death row inmate“Having access to these mind-altering substances can absolutely impact your conscious state and your decision-making,” said David Dadiomov, an assistant professor of clinical pharmacy at the University of Southern California.Dadiomov also said the way these drugs are used among people who are incarcerated is different because of the setting. “Things are misused simply based on access,” he said. “At extremely high doses, because these substances are usually very potent, they also cause psychotic-like effects, or effects that are quite different from what people classically view as intoxication from marijuana.”During Hamm’s deposition, Hahn questioned how Smith could have drugs in his system when he “had been watched for four days straight before an execution.”“Somehow he was able to, from an isolation cell, obtain flakka or whatever that synthetic cannabinoid source was,” Hahn said of Smith.“Certainly taking drugs is illegal,” Hahn added, “but so is providing drugs to a prisoner. And somebody got those drugs into that prison.”During the deposition, the judge suggested drugs could be getting into Alabama prisons another way.“There has been an issue in the state prison system of lawyers bringing in papers that have been soaked in drugs and then giving them to their clients and DOC, you know, or whatever the facility maybe can’t stop that from happening because it’s legal papers,” Judge Huffaker said. “And then the particular inmate smokes or ingests it or does whatever with it.”Hahn denied his law office had ever done so.He declined to comment about Grayson’s case when reached by NBC News this week.A lawyer for Smith also couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.Read more death row coverageAn Idaho warden acquired hard-to-get lethal injection drugs from an undisclosed supplier on a rural roadAfter Biden commuted federal death row sentences, DAs are weighing state chargesSouth Carolina prepares for first firing squad execution, ushering in return of rare methodIndiana carries out first execution in 15 years in process scrutinized for its secrecyDearman, who initially pleaded not guilty to the crimes, later fired his two court-appointed attorneys and changed his plea to guilty.In a phone interview with NBC News in April 2024, Dearman said he had dropped the appeals in his case and was ready for the state to execute him on capital murder and kidnapping charges.Dearman said he was high on meth in 2016 when he burst into a bungalow armed with an ax and firearms in a rural area near Mobile. His estranged ex-girlfriend, Laneta Lester, was staying at the home, which belonged to her brother.Dearman was convicted of killing five people while they slept: Lester’s brother, Joseph Adam Turner, 26, and his wife, Shannon Melissa Randall, 35; Randall’s brother, Robert Lee Brown, 26; and two others who lived at the home, Justin Kaleb Reed, 23, and his wife, Chelsea Marie Reed, 22, who was five months pregnant. Dearman was also convicted in the death of the Reed’s unborn child.He told NBC News last year that he was addicted to drugs since he was a teenager and that his dependency on them ignited the rampage.“Drugs turned me into a very unpredictable, unstable and violent person,” he said. “That’s not who I am. The person that committed these crimes and the person who I truly am is two different people.”Dadiomov said there is a strong correlation between long-term meth use and severe mental illness, likening meth-induced psychosis to schizophrenia.“They present similarly,” he said. “They can have the similar features of hallucinations, so seeing things that aren’t there or hearing things that aren’t there.”Morrison, who represented Mills on Alabama’s death row, said the need for inmates to turn to drugs in prison, and then potentially gain access to narcotics from corrections officers and other employees, only shows the absence of rehabilitation and programming to help prisoners — even those relegated to death row.“It impacts any sense of hope,” Morrison said. “It’s a system that reflects to an entire group of people that they do not have worth.”Abigail BrooksAbigail Brooks is a producer for NBC News.Erik OrtizErik Ortiz is a senior reporter for NBC News Digital focusing on racial injustice and social inequality.
December 10, 2025
Trump says U.S. seized tanker off coast of Venezuela
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved