• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Supreme Court turns away Alex Jones' attempt to block $1.5B defamation judgment

admin - Latest News - October 14, 2025
admin
25 views 18 secs 0 Comments




The Supreme Court rejected conservative conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ last-ditch attempt to block an almost $1.5 billion defamation judgment he faces over false claims that the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Drone footage shows destruction of Gaza City
NEXT
Joyous scenes as Israelis and Palestinians welcome their loved ones
Related Post
September 22, 2025
By Berkeley Lovelace Jr., Aria Bendix and Erika EdwardsPresident Donald Trump said Monday the Food and Drug Administration approved a chemotherapy drug called leucovorin as a treatment to alleviate symptoms of autism, despite little evidence that the medication works.Trump also said the administration is issuing a warning to doctors not to recommend acetaminophen — the active ingredient in Tylenol and other widely used medications — for pregnant women, claiming it may be linked to autism in children. Trump had been teasing the announcement for days, as Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other health officials have pledged to determine the cause of the developmental disorder by September.The administration had planned to release its long-awaited report on causes of autism around Sept. 29 or Sept. 30, a person familiar with the matter told NBC News. But Trump pre-empted the rollout over the weekend, and details soon appeared in The Washington Post.“We understood a lot more than a lot of people who studied it,” Trump said from the White House, referring to autism. He spoke alongside Kennedy, Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary, National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya and Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. ”Taking Tylenol is not good,” Trump said. “I’ll say it. It’s not good.”Leucovorin is a drug approved by the FDA to counteract the side effects of certain chemotherapy drugs and sometimes used off-label to treat vitamin B9 deficiency. Leucovorin is a form of folinic acid, a B vitamin. It has shown promise in clinical trials with helping some children with autism improve their speech. But the Autism Science Foundation, which funds evidence-based autism research, does not recommend it as a treatment yet and says more studies are needed.Trump said the FDA updated the drug’s label Monday for the treatment of autism symptoms. Oz said Medicaid — in partnership with states — will cover it with a prescription.“We believe insurance companies will rapidly follow our lead,” he said.Kennedy also said the FDA will issue a letter advising health care providers that the over-the-counter medication should be used during pregnancy only in cases of high fever, when the fever itself may pose a health risk to the fetus. The FDA’s notice, sometimes called a “Dear Doctor” letter, is meant to alert physicians and other prescribers about urgent or clinically significant safety issues it has identified with a drug. Kennedy also said the FDA will begin the process to initiate a safety label change for the drug.Bhattacharya said at Monday’s briefing that the NIH will dedicate $50 million to 13 research projects focused on identifying root causes and treatments for autism, an effort known as the “autism data science initiative.” The research will focus on environmental and medical factors, nutrition, events during pregnancy, biology and genetics, he said.“Given this wide range of symptoms across the spectrum, it seems certain that there will be a wide range of biological contributors to explaining the cause,” he said.Researchers who’ve spent decades researching potential causes of autism say the administration hasn’t uncovered any new evidence — and the existing data still doesn’t support its claims.“This is not new,” Dr. Allison Bryant, a high-risk obstetrician at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, said in an earlier interview. “It has bubbled up every now and again with studies that show maybe some kind of association but not clearly showing any cause and effect.”Experts say autism spectrum disorder, which is characterized by challenges with social and speech skills and by repetitive behaviors, most likely stems from multiple factors rather than a single cause. It affects 1 in 31 children in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.The bulk of scientific research hasn’t identified a link between acetaminophen and autism.“The science hasn’t changed regardless of what comes out from the report,” said Brian K. Lee, a professor of epidemiology at Drexel University in Philadelphia, referring to the Trump administration’s finding. “I’m not sure what the administration is doing, but it looks like they’re just going back and reviewing the evidence and they’re coming to a different conclusion than many scientists would.”Acetaminophen was introduced in the United States in the 1950s as a prescription alternative to aspirin. By the 1970s, it had been made available over the counter and became one of the most commonly used pain and fever medications in the country. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and other major medical groups say acetaminophen is one of the only safe pain relievers for women during pregnancy, and studies have shown no clear evidence that use during pregnancy leads to developmental issues in kids. The drug is also found in name brands like Theraflu and Excedrin.Forty percent to 65% of women use acetaminophen at some point during pregnancy, according to a 2014 study published in the American Family Physician.Earlier Monday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt touted a “major announcement” from Trump, telling reporters at a briefing to go into the autism announcement with “some critical thinking skills and with some open ears.”“They are paying attention to studies, and the gold standard of science and research, that many in this city for far too long have turned a blind eye to,” she said.Trump administration officials are citing previous research, including a literature review Mount Sinai and Harvard researchers published last month in the journal BMC Environmental Health. The review concluded there was most likely an association between autism and acetaminophen exposure during pregnancy. Outside autism researchers, however, said that the review wasn’t rigorously conducted and that it cherry-picked studies that supported its conclusion. The review’s senior author, Andrea Baccarelli, served in 2023 as a paid expert in a class action lawsuit against acetaminophen manufacturers, in which he testified that there was a link between the medication and autism. A judge ultimately excluded his testimony for being scientifically unsound and last year dismissed the case, which is being appealed.Baccarelli said in a statement that he and his colleagues conducted a rigorous review and that the association with neurodevelopmental disorders was strongest when acetaminophen was taken for four weeks or longer. He said he discussed his findings with Kennedy and Bhattacharya in recent weeks.“Further research is needed to confirm the association and determine causality, but based on existing evidence, I believe that caution about acetaminophen use during pregnancy — especially heavy or prolonged use — is warranted,” Baccarelli said.However, other autism researchers have pointed to a large study last year published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which found no link between acetaminophen use in pregnancy and autism, ADHD or intellectual disability. The study, from Lee and his colleagues in Sweden, analyzed data from more than 2.4 million children. When the researchers looked solely at children with autism, there was a small increased risk possibly associated with acetaminophen. But when the researchers compared siblings within the same families — one exposed during pregnancy, the other not — the link disappeared. The comparison allowed them to control for variables that past studies couldn’t. Siblings share a large part of their genetic background and often have similar environmental exposures in utero and at home.“The biggest elephant in the room here is genetics,” Lee said. “We know that autism, ADHD and other neurodevelopmental disorders are highly heritable.”In an emailed statement, a spokesperson for Kenvue, the maker of Tylenol, said the drug is the safest pain reliever option for pregnant women.“Without it, women face dangerous choices: suffer through conditions like fever that are potentially harmful to both mom and baby or use riskier alternatives,” the spokesperson said. “We believe independent, sound science clearly shows that taking acetaminophen does not cause autism.”Bryant, of Massachusetts General Hospital, said, “The best science that we have available would still suggest that acetaminophen is a safe pain reliever and fever reducer in pregnancy.”Berkeley Lovelace Jr.Berkeley Lovelace Jr. is a health and medical reporter for NBC News. He covers the Food and Drug Administration, with a special focus on Covid vaccines, prescription drug pricing and health care. He previously covered the biotech and pharmaceutical industry with CNBC.Aria BendixAria Bendix is the breaking health reporter for NBC News Digital.Erika EdwardsErika Edwards is a health and medical news writer and reporter for NBC News and “TODAY.”
November 8, 2025
Nov. 7, 2025, 9:36 AM EST / Updated Nov. 7, 2025, 9:34 PM ESTBy Aria Bendix, Ryan Nobles, Gary Grumbach and Lawrence HurleyWASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday at least temporarily allowed the Trump administration to withhold about $4 billion in payments for the SNAP food benefits program that a federal judge had ordered.The court via an order issued by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson provisionally blocked an order issued by Rhode Island-based U.S. District Judge John McConnell that required the payments to be made by Friday night.The administration has said that because of the government shutdown, there is only enough money to pay partial benefits this month. It had previously agreed to pay about $5 billion from a SNAP contingency fund but objected to paying another $4 billion from a separate program, arguing McConnell had no authority to force it to.Earlier on Friday, the Agriculture Department had indicated it would make the full payments, according to a memo obtained by NBC News. Patrick Penn, the deputy undersecretary of the Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services, informed states that USDA “will complete the processes necessary” to fully issue SNAP benefits for the time being.McConnell on Thursday afternoon ordered the administration to deliver full payments to states by Friday, chastising it for delays that he said have likely caused SNAP recipients to go hungry.The Trump administration unsuccessfully asked the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to immediately block McConnell’s order while that court considers the case in more detail. The administration then turned to the Supreme Court.In her order, Jackson said a temporary stay was required so that the appeals court can consider the government’s application in full. Jackson is the justice assigned responsibility for appeals from the Boston-based appeals court.That court had said in an earlier order that it intends to act “as quickly as possible.”Nearly 42 million people rely on the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as food stamps.Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X Friday that “The Supreme Court just granted our administrative stay in this case. Our attorneys will not stop fighting, day and night, to defend and advance President Trump’s agenda.”The administration agreed earlier this week to use $4.65 billion in contingency funds to cover about 65% of the benefits that eligible households would ordinarily receive. But it argued that it cannot draw from additional funds set aside for child nutrition programs, known as Section 32 funding, to fully fund SNAP because doing so would take away resources from other programs, like school lunches.“Once those billions are out the door, there is no ready mechanism for the government to recover those funds — to the significant detriment of those other critical social programs whose budgets the district court ordered the government to raid,” Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in the Supreme Court filing.The back-and-forth over SNAP funding has persisted for weeks. First, the administration said the funding would not be distributed in November as long as the federal government remained closed. However, the progressive legal advocacy group Democracy Forward challenged that plan in a lawsuit, prompting McConnell last week to order the Trump administration to distribute benefits as soon as possible.Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said earlier this week that the partial payments were disbursed to states. Since states oversee the process of loading payments onto electronic benefits cards, the Trump administration has argued that it has done its part by authorizing SNAP funding and giving states information to calculate partial benefits for households.However, McConnell said Thursday that the administration’s actions did not comply with his order to deliver the payments expeditiously and efficiently.“People have gone without for too long. Not making payments to them for even another day is simply unacceptable,” McConnell said, adding: “This should never happen in America.”This is the first time SNAP benefits have lapsed because of a government shutdown in the program’s 61-year history. Some families whose EBT cards were due to be reloaded already this week have reported skipping meals or subsisting on the meager foods remaining in their pantries, such as cereal or ramen.We’d like to hear from you about how you’re experiencing the government shutdown, whether you’re a federal employee who can’t work right now, a person who relies on federal benefits like SNAP, or someone who is feeling the effects of other shuttered services in your everyday life. Please contact us at tips@nbcuni.com or reach out to us here.Aria BendixAria Bendix is the breaking health reporter for NBC News Digital.Ryan NoblesRyan Nobles is chief Capitol Hill correspondent for NBC News.Gary GrumbachGary Grumbach is an NBC News legal affairs reporter, based in Washington, D.C.Lawrence HurleyLawrence Hurley is a senior Supreme Court reporter for NBC News.
November 4, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleNov. 3, 2025, 6:06 PM ESTBy Aria Bendix, Corky Siemaszko, Shannon Pettypiece and Garrett HaakeAfter foodbanks and SNAP recipients spent weeks bracing for a suspension of federal food assistance, the benefits appeared to be partially salvaged on Monday. But the disruption is already wreaking havoc on the normally steadfast program.The Trump administration on Monday agreed to partially fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as food stamps, after two court cases challenged the lapse in benefits. The administration said in a court filing that it will use $4.65 billion in contingency funds to cover about half of eligible households’ benefits this month. Beyond that, however, benefits are expected to run dry. It’s the first time SNAP recipients will go without some of their benefits during a government shutdown. Funding for the program was supposed to renew on Saturday, so many people have already gone days without the money they were expecting. It’s still unclear how quickly electronic benefits cards will be reloaded — the process of getting money loaded onto the cards often takes states a week or more — and families don’t yet know the exact amounts they will receive. For many, the SNAP suspension was one of the most feared outcomes of the shutdown: The prospect of losing grocery funds incited panic last week among many recipients, who lined up at food banks and began rationing what was left in their pantries. Politicians pointed fingers, with some state leaders scraping together emergency funds to fill the immense gaps. Misinformation swirled online, featuring racist tropes and fake videos.Until Monday, the Department of Agriculture had said it could not legally use contingency funds to keep SNAP running during the shutdown, but a federal judge in Rhode Island on Friday ordered the Trump administration to release at least partial funding for SNAP. SNAP contingency fund ‘isn’t enough,’ says Illinois Gov. Pritzker04:43For many recipients, partial benefits aren’t likely to last through the month — even with the full allotment, it’s common to run out before month’s end. Nearly 42 million Americans rely on SNAP assistance, and around 4 in 5 of these households include a child, an elderly person or someone with a disability. Recipients across the country get their benefits at various points in the month, so not everyone has faced a shortfall yet. As the specter of hunger looms nationwide, at least nine governors have issued emergency declarations over the potential loss of benefits. California, Iowa, Nevada and West Virginia have readied their state’s National Guards to help distribute food. And roughly 30 states have freed up funds to support food banks or supplement the loss of SNAP benefits. Democrats and Republicans have blamed each other for the SNAP chaos. The Trump administration has said Democrats could keep the funding from running dry by agreeing to a short-term measure that Republicans have already passed; that would keep SNAP, and the government, funded through Nov. 21. Democrats say Republicans need to take action on health care premiums that are going to skyrocket at the end of this year as part of any deal to end the shutdown.
November 23, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleNov. 23, 2025, 8:53 AM ESTBy Rohan Nadkarni and Andrew GreifBy the end of last season, the Minnesota Vikings had three quarterbacks on their roster: Sam Darnold, who started every game during a 14-3 regular season, Daniel Jones, who the team signed last November after he was released by the New York Giants, and rookie J.J. McCarthy, who missed the entire year after tearing his meniscus.After Darnold lost his last two starts — a regular season game that decided who won the NFC North, and a playoff game against the Los Angeles Rams — the Vikings determined he wasn’t the long-term answer at the position. Minnesota also didn’t see enough from Jones in practice to retain him.Darnold signed with the Seattle Seahawks in the offseason, while Jones signed with the Indianapolis Colts. Minnesota, meanwhile, handed the keys of the franchise to McCarthy, who in his last collegiate game completed only 10-of-18 passes for 140 yards.In Week 1, the Vikings looked like geniuses after McCarthy led a come-from-behind victory against the Chicago Bears.Entering Week 12, Minnesota may be second-guessing its decision, as Darnold and Jones have their respective teams near the top of the standings while the Vikings are floundering — with McCarthy a significant part of the problem.“Coming in here, I was taught how to play quarterback in a very different way,” McCarthy told reporters this week about his transition to being an NFL starter. “And that’s expected going into the league, going into any new team, any new system.”He added that injuries — McCarthy also missed time this season with a high ankle sprain — have robbed him of valuable practice time. As a result, Minnesota’s starter is learning on the fly.“It’s really hard,” McCarthy said. “You’re rewiring neurological pathways, and that’s not something that happens overnight. Just understanding and giving myself that grace, that patience, that I might not have it today, but it’s something that I’m gonna continue to strive after, day after day, rep after rep, and get to the place where we all want me to be.”A learning curve for a young quarterback is nothing new, but the Vikings’ struggles are tougher to swallow after the team was tied for the second-most wins in the NFL in 2024. Minnesota is currently 4-6 and on the outside of the playoffs in the NFC. McCarthy is 2-3 as a starter. What stings even worse for the Vikings is how well Darnold and Jones have played for their new teams. The Seahawks are 7-3, tied for the second-best record in the NFC, while the Colts are 8-2, a half game out of first place in the AFC.Compared to Darnold and Jones, McCarthy has thrown far fewer touchdowns, has been more turnover prone, and has a much worse passer rating. Minnesota, of course, was likely thinking long term by opting for McCarthy. And Darnold and Jones will still have to prove themselves in the postseason, while their teams will also have to decide how much money to commit to them in the near future. (McCarthy will be relatively more cost-controlled for three more seasons on his rookie contract.) For now, though, the Vikings have a built-to-win team with a star receiver in Justin Jefferson, a competitive defense coached by Brian Flores, but an offense averaging less points (21.8 compared to 25.4) and throwing for less yards (193.0 compared to 237.8) than it did a year ago.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved