• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Trump orders Pentagon to begin testing nuclear weapons 'immediately'

admin - Latest News - October 30, 2025
admin
14 views 13 secs 0 Comments




The U.S. voluntarily halted nuclear explosive testing in 1992, though it has the ability to resume tests at a site in Nevada.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Rare tortoises found safe after being stolen in Indiana
NEXT
Oct. 29, 2025, 5:41 PM EDTBy Katherine DoyleGYEONGJU, South Korea — President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping will meet in Busan, South Korea, on Thursday morning, looking to cool an increasingly heated relationship.The two sides are expected to discuss moves on tariffs, combating fentanyl and access to rare-earth minerals, while leaving bigger targets for later. The meeting is set to begin at 11 a.m. local time (10 p.m. Wednesday ET).With a Nov. 10 deadline to reach a tariff deal approaching, what began as Trump’s crackdown on the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. has broadened into a longer list of trade and security issues.The working expectation is that Trump and Xi will agree on a pause in the fight rather than finalizing a sweeping deal, a person familiar with the meeting planning said. Beijing could ease export curbs on strategically crucial rare earths, Washington could hold off on broad tariff hikes, and both sides could reach for gestures, such as expanded purchases of U.S. farm goods by China.Xi is also weighing steps on fentanyl chemicals, likely focused on choking off money-laundering networks tied to gangs, this person said. A rollout of a larger agreement could be staged around Trump’s planned visit to China next year.Trump has sounded upbeat about the prospect of reaching agreements. “I think we’re going to do well with China,” he said this week. “We meet, as you know, in South Korea with President Xi … and they want to make a deal. We want to make a deal.”He added that he and Xi have agreed to meet again in China and in the United States, “in either Washington or at Mar-a-Lago.”Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told NBC News this week that meeting is likely to come before Xi’s trip to the U.S. for the G20 at Trump’s Doral property in Florida next fall. Trump is likely to visit Xi in Beijing early next year, just ahead of the Lunar New Year, Bessent said.The president has said he expects to lower tariffs on China that he imposed over its role in the illicit international flow of fentanyl components. And he hopes to finalize a deal on TikTok that would allow the social media app to continue operating in the U.S. despite a law, passed before he took office, which had been poised to ban it.On Wednesday, Trump was overheard telling leaders at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum that he expects the meeting with Xi to last three to four hours. Both Trump and his Chinese counterpart want the optics and tactical aspect of this meeting to go well, the person familiar with the meeting planning said.Dan Caldwell, a former senior adviser to U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, said Trump deserves credit for pursuing a pragmatic China policy that maintains what he said was strategic ambiguity while taking steps to restore important military capabilities to deter Chinese aggression.“A lot of folks wanted to assume that he was going to be reflexively hawkish on China,” Caldwell said of Trump. “That hasn’t been the case.”But Caldwell cautioned against expecting a breakthrough in Busan. “I don’t think the overall push hinges on one meeting,” Caldwell said. “Ideally, these go well, but the whole thing does not hinge on just one set of talks.”In other words, the goal is to make enough progress to get to the next date between the leaders of the world’s two biggest economies.Miles Yu, a former State Department adviser on China, said the U.S. and Beijing are “sizing each other out” with trade now a key battleground issue. Washington is pushing for concrete steps on fentanyl, market access and more, he said, while China “stonewalls and foot-drags” and offers only broad “frameworks.”“This is the root cause of the five rounds of futile negotiations so far with China without a breakthrough,” Yu said, adding that the administration is trying to shift China’s approach by rallying its neighbors, a strategy that he said “may or may not work.”After talks with Chinese counterparts in Malaysia last weekend, Bessent said negotiators had shaped a framework for the two leaders to consider that spanned tariffs, trade, fentanyl, rare earths and “substantial” purchases of U.S. agricultural products such as soybeans. He credited Trump’s threat of an additional 100% tariff with creating leverage and said he believes that the framework would avoid that outcome and open space for tackling other issues.Trump’s meeting with Xi in Busan marks the end of a three-country Asia swing, during which he signed agreements with Malaysia, Cambodia, Thailand, Japan and South Korea; made new foreign investment announcements; and proclaimed that tariff leverage can drive warring parties to stand down. Reflecting on his approach, Trump said going against the grain can sometimes deliver results.“Oftentimes you’ll go the opposite way of almost everybody, and you’ll be the one that’s right, and the others will be the one that’s wrong,” he said, offering a peek into his thinking. “That’s where you have your greatest successes.”Still, Trump is continuing a long-standing practice of meeting with allies before Beijing, which former Assistant Secretary of State Dave Stilwell said indicates that the U.S. is not going to trade its alliance commitments for a deal with China.Some of the most sensitive terrain in the discussions involves critical minerals, said Stilwell, who also underscored the political guardrails around concerns for the Beijing-claimed island of Taiwan: “Acknowledge the words, but look at the actions,” he said, citing Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s recent comments that the U.S. isn’t trading away Taiwan’s sovereignty for better deal terms.Some of Trump’s aides are worried that the president could shift the U.S. position on independence for Taiwan, walking away from long-standing U.S. policy, and have advised him against it, NBC News reported this week.Trump seemed to downplay any discussions, saying, “I don’t know that we’ll even speak about Taiwan.” Xi “may want to ask about it,” Trump said. “There’s not that much to ask about. Taiwan is Taiwan.”Analysts in the region, too, see limited room for a sweeping agreement this week. It’s unlikely that Trump and Xi will reach a comprehensive deal that settles the long-term structural differences between the U.S. and China, said Zeng Jinghan, a professor of international relations at the City University of Hong Kong. “But some sort of consensus and agreements are very possible,” said Zeng, given that both sides want “a little bit of de-escalation.”The hope, Zeng added, is for “less aggressive” rhetoric, with both Beijing and Washington likely to come back and declare the meeting a success.After the meeting, Trump plans to board Air Force One and return to the U.S. He has appeared to relish the receptions from foreign leaders on this quick trip across Asia. In Tokyo, he stood alongside Japan’s new prime minister, Sanae Takaichi, accepting a gift of cherry blossom trees and a putter that belonged to his late friend and former Japanese leader Shinzo Abe, and in Seoul received from South Korean President Lee Jae Myung a large gold crown, a replica from the Silla period.In one snapshot, Trump and Lee were pictured in a gift shop at the Gyeongju National Museum, where items on display included a red “USA” hat, Trump-branded sneakers and a shirt bearing the president’s mugshot.Trump praised the welcome he received in “vibrant” Malaysia, where Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim compared their experiences with their countries’ legal systems, saying, “I was in prison, but you almost got there.”Katherine DoyleKatherine Doyle is a White House reporter for NBC News. Carol E. Lee, Peter Guo and Peter Alexander contributed.
Related Post
November 8, 2025
Hundreds of flights canceled as FAA cuts take effect
November 14, 2025
Nov. 14, 2025, 1:29 PM ESTBy Peter NicholasWASHINGTON — The East Wing that President Donald Trump tore down last month stood for decades.The ballroom he’s building in its place could be gone not long after the first wave of guests sit down for dinner, depending on the outcome of the 2028 presidential race.If elected, a Democratic president would have plenty to worry about aside from White House decor; war and peace can easily fill up a day. But a new president may face considerable pressure from within the Democratic fold to do something about a massive new ballroom forever linked to Trump.Already, prominent Democratic officials are workshopping ideas for repurposing the space in favor of something that’s decidedly un-Trump. If any of these come to fruition, the $300 million ballroom that Trump birthed could take on a function that he never intended.White House fires arts commission that reviews presidential construction projects02:51Should the ballroom be used as the president plans? “No way,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., who said he will consider a presidential bid if Democrats gain control of the House in the upcoming midterm elections. “This is a space that’s owned by the people and that serves the people,” Raskin said in an interview. “So, it should be used opposite of what Trump has in mind, which is for the American aristocracy and plutocracy to gather.”Rep. Ro Khanna of California, another Democrat viewed as a possible presidential candidate, said the ballroom should be used in a way that “celebrates and empowers forgotten Americans” as opposed to accommodating guests for glitzy state dinners.Letting the 90,000-square-foot structure remain a ballroom would only validate the means by which Trump built it: demolishing the East Wing without forewarning and bankrolling the project with private donations, Democratic officials suggested.At least one Democratic lawmaker wants the ballroom to meet its demise.“I don’t think it would be a bad idea to tear it down,” said Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn.“It’s this gigantic blob there that’s Donald Trump,” he added.The White House declined to comment on the ballroom’s fate under future Democratic presidents.Trump has said that a ballroom will enable successors to hold large events in a convenient indoor space as opposed to herding guests onto the South Lawn under makeshift tents. For 150 years, presidents have wanted just this kind of solution, the White House contends.“I hope it remains a ballroom and hope that it’s tastefully and beautifully done so that future presidents will be proud to host honored guests there,” said Anita McBride, a member of the White House Historical Association board of directors and former chief of staff to first lady Laura Bush. “But what I mostly hope is that the new building includes offices for the Office of the First Lady, White House social office and White House Visitor Office,” McBride added. “Those offices serve the presidency in a unique and special way, welcoming all visitors to the People’s House.”Past presidents also faced public backlash for transforming the White House. Harry Truman was ridiculed for putting up a balcony that overlooks the South Lawn. A newspaper cartoon in 1948 depicted Truman standing on the balcony named for him and shouting, “Love me… love my balcony.”But no president has undertaken any exterior renovation on the ballroom’s scale, nor have many presidents proved as polarizing as Trump.That makes the ballroom an inviting target for Democratic candidates and officeholders alike. There’s little downside. A Washington Post-Ipsos poll of adults last month showed that 88% of Democrats and 61% of independents opposed the ballroom project.“It’s a metaphor for this administration — the recklessness to which he goes about things, the fact that he doesn’t believe in rules, he doesn’t believe they apply to him,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom, another potential Democratic candidate for president, said in an interview last month with NBC News “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker.“So, you know, he’s a wrecking ball presidency,” Newsom said.Inertia is a potent force in life and in politics. A Democratic president with a mountain of promises to fulfill might conclude the easiest answer is to leave the ballroom alone, rather than spend time and money mothballing it. Newsom is no friend of Trump, but his office did not respond to a question about whether he’d like to see the ballroom razed.One Democratic candidate for Congress, Saikat Chakrabarti, suggested turning the ballroom into a Smithsonian-run museum. If elected, he said he will introduce a bill aimed at converting the ballroom into a museum focused on “corruption and autocracy.”The space would list the private companies that donated to the ballroom, said Chakrabarti, who is running for the San Francisco seat held by outgoing Rep. Nancy Pelosi, to “really put into the sunlight how this thing came to even be.” (Major companies that have contributed to Trump’s ballroom project include Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and Comcast Corp., the parent company of NBCUniversal, while the White House has said it is accepting other, anonymous donations.)On the campaign trail, Democratic candidates figure to propose creative alternatives for the ballroom. Raskin envisions a hybrid structure that could accommodate some dinner guests, but would also showcase exhibits devoted to America’s struggle to achieve full-fledged democracy.One side of the space would display the various attempts to “undermine and thwart popular democracy in American life,” starting with King George III during the Revolutionary War era and ending with Trump’s attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Raskin said.He said he would name the space the “Democracy Matters Ballroom.”Khanna said the ballroom’s future should be decided by way of vox populi.“We need a White House that is not for the tech billionaires, but for forgotten Americans,” he said.“In that spirit, we should ask Americans — in rural communities, urban centers and hollowed-out factory towns — for their ideas of what to do with the space,” Khanna said.A Republican successor to Trump might be more apt to keep the ballroom, interpreting victory as a vindication of Trump’s policies and priorities.Then again, Trump’s tastes aren’t for everyone. He likes gold; he’s partial to grand, formal spaces. A GOP president with a different aesthetic might not be quite as besotted with a ballroom nearly twice the size of the White House proper.“The White House is a residence that symbolizes American democracy,” said Edward Lengel, former chief historian for the White House Historical Association. The ballroom, he said, makes the White House resemble something else: “a palace.”Peter NicholasPeter Nicholas is a senior White House reporter for NBC News.Megan Lebowitz and Natasha Korecki contributed.
November 6, 2025
At least 12 dead from UPS cargo plane crash in Louisville
November 21, 2025
Nov. 21, 2025, 6:00 PM ESTBy The Politics DeskWelcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, a newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team’s latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail.In today’s edition, Kristen Welker breaks down an unexpectedly warm meeting between President Donald Trump and New York Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani. Plus, Ben Kamisar explores how the redistricting fight is scrambling campaigns ahead of the midterms. Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here.— Adam WollnerProgramming note: We’re taking a holiday break next week. We’ll be back on Dec. 1. Have a happy Thanksgiving!Trump and Mamdani find a surprising amount of common ground in their first meetingAnalysis by Kristen WelkerTheir improbable victories were fueled by populist messages, serving as direct repudiations of their parties’ elder statesmen and inspiring voters who normally sit on the sidelines. In countless ways — their backgrounds, their policies, their ages — President Donald Trump and New York Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani could not be more different. But the similar manner in which the two men rose to power provided the backdrop for their first face-to-face meeting in the Oval Office today. In an extraordinary reversal, the insults Trump and Mamdani have been trading for months evaporated in an instant this afternoon, with the two political foes shaking hands and showering each other with praise. Trump called his meeting with Mamdani “very productive,” adding that it “surprised” him — in a positive way. “We agree on a lot more than I would have thought,” said Trump, a native New Yorker. Trump and Mamdani downplayed their differences and played up their shared goals — on affordability, on peace in the Middle East and on wanting the best for New York City. “There were more New Yorkers who voted for President Trump in the most recent presidential election because of that focus on cost of living. And I’m looking forward to working together to deliver that affordability agenda,” Mamdani said, noting that about 1 in 10 of his voters backed Trump in 2024.Asked by reporters about the past attacks they’ve lobbed at each other, both politicians brushed them off. “I’ve been called worse than a despot,” Trump quipped in response to a question about Mamdani’s past criticism. And while Trump had previously floated cutting off federal funding to the city in response to Mamdani’s policy proposals, he told reporters today: “I don’t think that’s gonna happen. … I expect to be helping him, not hurting him.” The warm encounter between the two stands in stark contrast to how they treated each other in the run-up to this month’s mayoral election. Trump cast Mamdani, a democratic socialist, as a “communist” and issued a last-minute endorsement to his main opponent in the race, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Meanwhile, Mamdani called the administration “authoritarian” and memorably addressed Trump directly during his victory speech, telling him to “turn the volume up.”Today’s meeting is yet another way the 34-year-old Mamdani has stayed in the national spotlight since his election, perhaps sending a signal of the role he will play moving forward in a party that is still trying to find its footing following the 2024 election. His affordability-centric message has already inspired Democrats to follow a similar path heading into next year’s midterms. He publicly discouraged an ally who launched a primary challenge to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y. — one of the party leaders who was slow to embrace Mamdani’s candidacy. And Mamdani will sit down with me for an exclusive interview that will air on “Meet the Press” this Sunday. I will also speak with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn. I hope you’ll join us.Read more on the Trump-Mamdani meeting →How the redistricting fight has scrambled dozens of midterm campaigns across the countryBy Ben KamisarThe national redistricting battle has cast a long shadow over the race for control of Congress next year — not only fundamentally reshaping the battlefield, but also creating a domino effect that’s pushing candidates into new seats, ushering longtime lawmakers to the exits and exposing deep political rifts in state parties across the country.The fight is still playing out across courtrooms, back rooms and President Donald Trump’s social media accounts, as Republicans and Democrats tinker with district lines. Developments like this week’s federal court ruling blocking the new Texas maps from going into effect — leaving the ultimate decision to the Supreme Court — also show how much remains to be determined in the redistricting fight.Texas: The map Texas enacted over the summer adds more Republicans to the battleground districts represented by Democratic Reps. Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez, while redrawing two districts in Houston and Dallas in a way that will likely force incumbent Democrats into primaries against each other. It also split Austin to create one deep-blue seat and one additional Republican-leaning seat that stretches toward San Antonio. The Supreme Court’s eventual decision will have a significant impact on a spate of races, starting with whether Austin-area Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett decides to retire. There’s also the question of whether the winner of January’s special election to succeed the late Democratic Rep. Sylvester Turner will have to immediately run against a longtime Democratic incumbent, and how Democratic Reps. Marc Veasey, Julie Johnson and Jasmine Crockett handle a potentially significant redraw in North Texas that could leave one of them out of a job. The redistricting plan already has Crockett weighing a Senate bid.California: The Democratic-drawn map voters approved earlier this month has similar potential to upend the Republican caucus in the state. The districts represented by GOP Reps. Doug LaMalfa, Darrell Issa, Kevin Kiley, Ken Calvert and David Valadao are becoming significantly more vulnerable to being flipped by Democrats, according to an analysis from the University of Virginia Center for Politics.One early bit of fallout: Calvert’s decision to seek re-election in a nearby district currently represented by fellow Republican Rep. Young Kim, which will likely trigger an expensive primary between two prominent incumbents. In an early show of force, Kim has already announced plans to spend more than $3 million on ads ahead of the 2026 primary.Utah: A court decision to enact a new map over the protests of Republicans created a new blue seat in the Salt Lake City area — one that could spark a primary focused on ideology as well as electability, an unusual position for Utah’s Democratic minority. Read more from Ben →🗞️ Today’s other top stories🌏 Russia-Ukraine update: Trump said he wants Ukraine to accept a new peace deal by Thanksgiving, after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy warned the proposal was forcing his country to choose between its “dignity” and a “key partner.” Read more →🗣️ War of words: Trump said that he’s “not threatening death” toward a group of Democratic members of Congress whom he accused of committing “seditious behavior,” which he said a day earlier was “punishable by death.” Read more →🛥️ Reality check: Drug cartels operating vessels in the Caribbean, where roughly 50% of U.S. airstrikes have taken place, are mainly moving cocaine from South America to Europe — not to the U.S., according to current and former U.S. law enforcement and military officials as well as narcotics experts. Read more →🛢️ Drill, baby, drill: The Trump administration announced new oil drilling off the California and Florida coasts for the first time in decades. Read more →🗳️ Special election watch: The Democratic group House Majority PAC is putting more than $1 million into TV and digital ad reservations ahead of the Dec. 2 special election in Tennessee’s deep-red 7th District. Democrat Aftyn Behn raised more than $1 million from Oct. 1 to Nov. 12, while Republican Matt Van Epps brought in about $591,000. Read more →💰 Money moves: The Democratic National Committee took out a $15 million loan in October, an unusually large amount of debt for this point in the political calendar, as the party looks to rebuild its brand and infrastructure under new leadership. Read more →🔵 2026 watch: Rep. Eric Swalwell announced that he will run for California governor, the latest Democrat to join the crowded race to succeed outgoing Gov. Gavin Newsom. Read more →🗽 2026 watch, cont.: 72-year-old Rep. Nydia Velázquez, D-N.Y., will not seek re-election next year, telling The New York Times that “now is the right moment to step aside and allow a new generation of leaders to step forward.” Read more →🔴 2028 watch: Long-simmering tensions between Trump and Sen. Ted Cruz are boiling over, with White House allies convinced that the Texas Republican is aiming to boost his 2028 presidential prospects at the expense of Vice President JD Vance. Read more →💲 It’s still the economy: In Nevada, concerns about the direction of the economy and high costs are threatening to wipe away the gains Trump and the GOP have made with Latino voters. Read more →That’s all From the Politics Desk for now. Today’s newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner.If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at politicsnewsletter@nbcuni.comAnd if you’re a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here. The Politics Desk    
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved