• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Trump says he authorized CIA action inside Venezuela

admin - Latest News - October 16, 2025
admin
24 views 6 secs 0 Comments



Trump says he authorized CIA action inside Venezuela



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Oct. 15, 2025, 5:26 PM EDT / Updated Oct. 15, 2025, 8:15 PM EDTBy Alexandra MarquezZohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee in the New York mayoral race, said Wednesday that it was “too early” to give President Donald Trump credit for negotiating a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, saying he would be willing to do so if the ceasefire is “lasting” and “durable.””When it comes to the ceasefire, I am thankful, and I have hope that it will actually endure and that it will be lasting,” Mamdani told Fox News’ Martha MacCallum.Asked by MacCallum about whether he credits Trump, whose administration negotiated the first phase of the peace plan with Israel and Hamas, Mamdani said, “I think it’s too early to do so.””If it proves to be something that is lasting, something that is durable, then I think that that is where you give credit,” he said.Anna Kelly, a spokesperson for the White House, said Wednesday night that “even Barack Hussein Obama and top Democrats have praised President Trump for his historic peace deal that received overwhelming support from Israelis and Arab leaders alike. The Little Communist clearly isn’t ready for prime-time.”Mamdani, who won the Democratic primary for mayor in June, beating almost a dozen other Democratic candidates — including former Gov. Andrew Cuomo — has come under scrutiny for his views on Israel and the Middle East.He has long supported recognizing the state of Palestine and labeled the war in Gaza a “genocide,” and he received criticism from his opponents and Jewish groups earlier when he initially declined to condemn the phrase “globalize the intifada” in a podcast interview.Inside UNICEF’s aid operation in Gaza after the ceasefire05:11In June, Mamdani told NBC News’ “Meet the Press” that it was “not language that I use” and that “I don’t believe that the role of the mayor is to police speech.”Weeks later, The New York Times reported that Mamdani told business leaders that he would “discourage” others from using the phrase. In Wednesday’s Fox News interview, Mamdani said that he was still skeptical that the peace deal would last, citing reports that Israeli soldiers killed five Palestinians in Gaza on Tuesday.”I continue to have concerns, because I’ve seen reports still, just in the last few days, that five Palestinians were killed by the Israeli military. And that’s what gives me pause about issuing any kind of praise or celebration at a moment when it is still in its infancy,” Mamdani told MacCallum.He also responded to the news that Hamas, which, as part of the peace deal, agreed to return living and deceased hostages taken in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel, returned a body that was not that of one of the hostages.“I think those are bodies or remains that should absolutely be returned. And I think that I have no issue critiquing Hamas or the Israeli government because my critiques all come from a place of universal human rights,” Mamdani said.Several of the families of deceased hostages called this week for an “immediate suspension” of the ceasefire agreement when just four of 28 deceased hostages were initially returned to Israel.Trump traveled to Israel this week to oversee the implementation of the first phase of the peace deal and speak before the Israeli Knesset.Mamdani on Wednesday also reiterated his long-stated position about whether he would arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is under an arrest warrant that has been imposed by the International Criminal Court. “This is a city that believes in international law,” he said, adding, “I believe that we should uphold arrest warrants by the International Criminal Court.”Mamdani added that he wouldn’t create legislation to uphold an international arrest warrant and that he would “exhaust every legal option in front of me” to arrest people under warrants only if they visited New York City.Alexandra MarquezAlexandra Marquez is a politics reporter for NBC News.
NEXT
Booming stock market led by tech has some saying it feels like the 1999 internet bubble
Related Post
October 23, 2025
Oct. 22, 2025, 2:08 PM EDTBy Elizabeth CohenWhen a radiologist reviewed Deirdre Hall’s mammogram images last summer, everything seemed fine. There were no shadows or lumps or irregular patches that could signal cancer.The doctor gave it a second look for one reason: artificial intelligence software had drawn a circle around an area in the upper part of her left breast that it found suspicious.Because the AI software had put up that red flag, Hall, 55, got an order for an ultrasound that led to a biopsy. There were four cancerous tumors in the spot AI had identified.“This would have been completely missed without the AI,” said Dr. Sean Raj, chief medical officer and chief innovation officer at SimonMed Imaging in Tempe, Arizona, where Hall had her mammogram.Not only was Hall’s breast tissue dense, but the layers of tissue crisscrossed over each other in a particularly complicated pattern.“It camouflaged the cancer,” said Raj, a breast imaging specialist. “Even I could have missed it.”They caught her cancer at Stage 1, said Hall, who’s a respiratory therapist at a local hospital.“They didn’t find anything in the lymph nodes, which they were grateful for,” she said. “I’m so glad they caught it early.” “I’m glad it was found,” Deirdre Hall said about the software program that detected suspicious images on her mammogram.Courtesy Deirdre HallWhen reading women’s routine mammograms, radiologists are increasingly augmenting their eyes with artificial intelligence. While many major medical centers have adopted the technology enthusiastically, some experts point to concerns, including a lack of studies in the U.S. showing that AI actually saves lives and does not needlessly raise concerns about benign growths. Experts train AI software by feeding it hundreds of thousands, or sometimes millions of mammogram images. Some of the images contain cancerous tumors, and, over time, the AI learns to distinguish the often subtle differences between malignant and benign tissue. Some AI programs, like the one used on Hall, identify a suspicious area. Others predict the chance that a woman will develop breast cancer. At the University of California, San Francisco, researchers are using AI to try to speed up the time from a mammogram to cancer diagnosis. In a study released this week, the radiologists used the technology to flag suspicious-looking mammograms so those patients could be seen more quickly. For patients with breast cancer, that AI triage cut the average time from mammogram to biopsy by 87%, from 73 days to nine days. The study was posted Tuesday to the preprint server MedRxiv. (Studies posted to preprint servers have not been peer-reviewed.) AI software used by SimonMed Imaging, where Hall had her mammogram, marked an area suspicious for cancer.Courtesy Deirdre HallHowever, Dr. Sonja Hughes, vice president of community health at Susan G. Komen, a breast cancer organization, said more research is needed before AI is used as the standard of care. “We’re not there yet,” she said. “We don’t have enough research or enough data.”Dense breasts: Finding a snowball in a blizzardMammograms have saved countless lives, but they’re imperfect. Dense breast tissue, which is a risk factor for developing cancer, makes mammograms harder to interpret. About 40% of U.S. women have dense breasts, according to the American Cancer Society. “It’s like trying to find a snowball in a blizzard,” said Dr. Otis Brawley, a professor of oncology and epidemiology at Johns Hopkins University.The Food and Drug Administration has authorized many AI programs for mammograms, with varying rates of accuracy. The AI software used on Hall’s mammogram, called Lunit, accurately identified cancers 88.6% of the time, according to a 2024 JAMA Oncology study of more than 8,800 women in Sweden who got mammograms. Another study published in Radiology noted that AI software caught cancers that were missed by two radiologists. However, in the Sweden study, AI gave a false positive 7% of the time, saying there might be a tumor when there wasn’t one. A false positive can trigger more testing and anxiety while waiting for results. With any mammogram, the chance of having a false positive result is about 10%, according to research.A doctor interprets the screening’s resultsMajor academic medical centers using AI in their imaging centers include the MD Anderson Cancer Center, the Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City, the Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, the Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, and MedStar Health.In all centers, the software is used along with, not instead of, a radiologist’s eyes, as FDA regulations require a doctor to interpret mammograms. Some breast imaging experts see advantages to this human-machine combination.“The nice thing about AI is that it doesn’t get tired,” said Dr. Lisa Abramson, associate professor of radiology at Mount Sinai. “It’s not going to replace the job or the expertise of radiologists, but I think it’s only going to enhance our ability to detect more and more breast cancers.”Brawley, the Johns Hopkins professor, said AI could help women who don’t have access to radiologists who specialize in breast imaging, and instead have their mammograms read by general radiologists.A study using RadNet’s software found that without AI, specialists correctly identified breast cancers 89% of the time, compared with 84% for generalists. With AI, the accuracy for both groups rose to about 93%.“It’s incredibly subjective when a human reads a mammogram,” Brawley said. “Maybe it’s going to reduce the disparities in how these things are read.”Does AI cost more? Typically, academic medical centers don’t charge patients extra for the use of AI software, and they can’t charge insurance companies for it, since there’s no billing code specifically for the AI, according to Susan G. Komen, a nonprofit breast cancer organization. SimonMed, which has centers in 11 states, and RadNet, which has centers in eight states, don’t charge for an initial layer of AI on mammograms, although patients are charged $40 and $50 respectively if they opt to have their images run through a second set of the technology.Drawbacks of AIBrawley worries that AI might be too good at its job.According to the American Cancer Society, it’s possible that mammograms flag some tumors that are technically cancerous, but not life-threatening. The patient then undergoes the physical, emotional, and financial toll of treating a tumor that was never going to hurt her.“It’scancer, but it’s not genetically programmed to grow, spread, or kill,” Brawley said. “I am worried that AI may help us find even more of these tumors that don’t need to be found.”Brawley pointed to the lack of data in the U.S. that shows AI actually saves women’s lives.Last month, researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles and University of California, Davis, announced a $16 million, two-year study at seven medical centers to take a deeper look at the technology.There are several other concerns about using AI in mammography. The technology isn’t perfect, and some worry that doctors could make mistakes if they become too dependent on it, according to an article last year in RadioGraphics. That’s why radiologists emphasize that AI is a tool, not a solution in itself. “It’s not going to replace the job or the expertise of radiologists,” said Abramson, the breast radiologist at Mount Sinai. “I think it’s only going to enhance our ability to detect more and more breast cancer.” Another concern is that if AI is trained mainly on breast images of white women, it could be less accurate for women of color, since genetic differences can make tumors look different.Hall, the Arizona patient, said she’s not necessarily a fan of AI in general — she says she finds the technology “creepy” — but she’s glad she paid $50 for the extra AI on her mammogram. “I don’t love all this AI stuff, but I definitely love this for me or anyone else in my position,” she said. “No matter how it was found, I’m glad it was found.” Guidance for mammogramsGuidance from the United Services Preventive Services Task Force recommends women to get a mammogram every other year starting at age 40. According to American Cancer Society guidelines:Women 45 to 54 should get mammograms every year.Women 55 and older can switch to a mammogram every other year, or they can choose to continue yearly mammograms.Dr. Shanthi Sivendran, senior vice president at the American Cancer Society, offers guidance for more accurate breast cancer screening. Try to go to the same place every year so radiologists can compare your images over time.Ask if a center uses radiologists who’ve completed a fellowship in breast imaging. In some rural or underserved areas, it may be harder to find these specialists, and so women should seek out radiologists who primarily read breast images. Try to find a center that can either provide or direct you to follow-up care, such as additional imaging, in case your mammogram finds something suspicious. According to FDA regulations, your mammogram report should state if you have dense breasts. If you do, ask your doctor about whether you might need additional imaging tests. Elizabeth CohenElizabeth Cohen is a Peabody Award-winning journalist and a health contributor to NBC News. She is the author of the book “The Empowered Patient.” 
October 22, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleOct. 22, 2025, 1:58 PM EDTBy Berkeley Lovelace Jr.Ginny Murray says she and her husband, Chaz, are out of options for health insurance. In January, their premiums are expected to rise higher than they’ve ever gone up before, putting the cost out of reach. The Arkansas couple plan to drop their coverage, betting their savings will be enough if unexpected illness strikes.“Our plan is to keep putting the money we’re already paying towards health care in savings,” said Murray, whose insurance is covered through the Affordable Care Act, “and really just hoping that we don’t have a stroke or we don’t have a heart attack.”They’re part of a broader shift taking shape as enhanced subsidies for ACA premiums are set to expire at the end of the year. Without them, many Americans could see their monthly premiums double or even triple next year, a spike that’s forcing people to rethink what they can afford — or whether health insurance is even worth it. Next year will be the biggest premium increase since the ACA took effect, said Art Caplan, the head of the medical ethics division at NYU Grossman School of Medicine in New York City. Open enrollment for ACA plans begins next month, and there is no data yet on how many people plan on dropping their coverage. However, the Congressional Budget Office projects nearly 4 million will drop their health insurance for next year if the subsidies expire. The issue has paralyzed Washington, where Democrats say they won’t vote to reopen the government unless the tax credits are extended.For Murray, 48, the math simply doesn’t work. A truck driver, she was injured in a work accident 2 ½ years ago and is still receiving workers’ compensation, unable to work full time. Her husband, also a truck driver, continues to drive as an independent owner-operator.The couple’s monthly premium is around $1,500; with the subsidies, it comes down to around $450. But the state regulators approved a 26% rate increase for their insurer, which means their premiums will rise by at least $400 next year. The cost could more than triple if the subsidies expire.“What other choice do we have?” Murray said. ‘A catastrophic event’Choosing to go uninsured isn’t new. Before the ACA became law in 2010, millions of Americans made similar choices — often with devastating financial consequences, said Dr. Adam Gaffney, a critical care physician and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School. From 2010 to 2023, the rate of people going uninsured fell from around 16% — about 48 million people — to 7.7%, according to data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a nonpartisan research group. Meanwhile, enrollment in ACA plans has grown from 8 million people in 2014 to a record 24.3 million people in 2025, thanks in part to the enhanced subsidies, according to the health policy research group KFF. “Unless you are extraordinarily rich, it is effectively not possible to save enough money to cover the costs of a serious illness or major trauma,” Gaffney said. “For the uninsured, medical debt and bankruptcy is just one major illness or injury away.” That reality is compounded by the fact that many Americans don’t have much of a financial cushion, said JoAnn Volk, co-director of Georgetown University’s Center on Health Insurance Reforms.In 2024, roughly 37% of adults said they would struggle to cover a $400 emergency expense, according to the Federal Reserve. And for those who do manage to build a large emergency fund, the balance often pales in comparison to what a common medical procedure could cost, Volk said. window.addEventListener(“message”,function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}});“I’m sure people plan to save the money,” Volk said, “but [I’m] not sure how many can do so, and I expect they don’t know how much they’ll need for some common procedures if they have to pay out of pocket, let alone a catastrophic event or unexpected diagnosis.”‘It’s only gotten worse’D’nelle Dowis, of Denver, knows how quickly an unexpected medical expense can add up. She recalls how her father’s appendectomy in the 1990s was a huge financial burden for her family. “It was a big thing for our family having to deal with that,” Dowis said. “So, there’s some kind of childhood fears wrapped up in this.” Still, Dowis and her husband, Christopher, plan to drop their ACA coverage for next year and put that money into a high-yield savings account. The Denver couple, both in their 40s, run a web development business together — which Dowis says they were only able to start due to the safety net the ACA provided. They pay about $600 a month in premiums, but that could jump to $1,300 next year. D’nelle and Christopher Dowis and their two dogs.Courtesy of Dowis familyKeeping their coverage would mean cutting back on care for their two aging dogs, both of whom have cancer, as well as putting less money toward their retirement savings and holiday travel to visit family. “We’d be cutting down on other things that I see as necessities, and I’m not sure if, at this point in my 40s, I’m necessarily willing to do that or not,” Dowis said. Both she and her husband are healthy, which makes going without coverage feel manageable for now. “I am exceptionally frustrated and there’s a level of anger to it,” Dowis said. “We’ve had 15 years now to try to solve this problem, and it’s only gotten worse.” Claire Esparros, 34, said she has the same “psychological, mental, emotional breakdown” every year when it’s time to renew her ACA coverage and face the new monthly rate.Esparros, a New York City-based freelance photographer, has no major health problems and mostly uses her coverage for the basics — annual physicals and the occasional sick visit. But she said her plan hasn’t offered much peace of mind.“It’s horrible insurance,” she said. She has a so-called catastrophic plan, which carries a deductible of nearly $10,000. “The only reason I have it is if something truly horrible happens.”Next year, though, she’s planning to let it go. Her monthly premium is set to triple from about $300 to $900 — and she said she can no longer justify the cost.Instead of setting up a savings account like the Murrays and Dowises, Esparros is exploring health care co-ops, which pool money among members to cover medical expenses.Caplan, of NYU Grossman School of Medicine, said co-ops, sometimes called community-based self-insurance, can be cheaper and more flexible — especially for healthy people — but they aren’t regulated under the ACA. That means they may not cover certain medical bills and are subject to bankruptcy from a single expensive case. “It is a ‘Put your faith in your neighbor’ idea,” he said.Esparros has been looking into two options and said so far she hasn’t heard of any major drawbacks. “It feels more personal and safe,” she said.Berkeley Lovelace Jr.Berkeley Lovelace Jr. is a health and medical reporter for NBC News. He covers the Food and Drug Administration, with a special focus on Covid vaccines, prescription drug pricing and health care. He previously covered the biotech and pharmaceutical industry with CNBC.Geet Jeswani and Jiachuan Wu contributed.
November 13, 2025
Trump Signs Bill to Reopen Government After Record Shutdown
November 13, 2025
Typhoon exposes centuries-old shipwreck in Vietnam
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved