• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Trump says Mamdani will 'change' in office

admin - Latest News - November 21, 2025
admin
9 views 29 secs 0 Comments



President Donald Trump met with New York City’s Democratic mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani at the White House, where the two discussed issues including the cost of living and the conflict in the Middle East. As Trump acknowledged the ideological differences between the two, he also said he thought Mamdani would “change his mind” after working together. 



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Full: Mamdani meets with Trump in Oval Office
NEXT
Trump brushes off Mamdani's recent 'fascist' comment
Related Post
November 3, 2025
Nov. 2, 2025, 6:53 PM ESTBy Rohan NadkarniThe Chicago Bears and Cincinnati Bengals played one of the most thrilling games of the NFL season Sunday, a rollercoaster ride that ended with a 47-42 win for the Bears. Joe Flacco threw for 470 yards and four touchdowns in the loss, while Caleb Williams threw for 280 yards and three scores. The teams combined for 31 points in a thrilling fourth quarter — including 28 in the final five minutes. The chaos began with less than six minutes to go. The Bears were leading 34-27 when the Bengals lined up for a 54-yard field goal, only for Evan McPherson to miss the kick short.Two plays later, Chicago wide receiver D.J. Moore was ruled out at the 1-yard line on a running play, but Cincinnati challenged to see if Moore fumbled out of the endzone for a touchback. The Bengals technically won the challenge, but it backfired: The play was overturned to a touchdown, giving the Bears a 41-27 lead.On Cincinnati’s next drive, Flacco brought the offense all the way to the way to the 5-yard line before he was picked off by a diving Tremaine Edmunds, who ran the ball all the way back for a pick-six. Upon review however, Edmunds was ruled down by contact, taking the touchdown off the board.Following the interception, the Bears had a two-score lead with two minutes and 42 seconds to go — a 99.6% win probability, per ESPN. But Chicago went three-and-out in only 27 seconds, giving the Bengals the ball back quickly. Flacco needed only four plays to go 55 yards and find Noah Fant for a 23-yard touchdown. After the Fant score, Cincinnati also converted a two-point conversion to cut the lead to 41-35. After the 2-pointer, the Bengals miraculously recovered an onside kick. The ball didn’t travel 10 yards, but it touched the foot of a Bears player, allowing Cincinnati to pounce on the kick.This time, Flacco drove down the field in six plays, finding Andrei Iosavas for the go-ahead touchdown with only 54 seconds to go.Chicago’s next drive started poorly. Williams threw back-to-back incompletions before finally scrambling for a first on 3rd-and-10, causing the Bears to use their final timeout.That set up a 1st-and-10 for Chicago on its own 42 with 25 seconds to go. On that play, Williams fired a strike to tight end Colston Loveland over the middle of the field. Loveland somehow escaped the grasp of two Bengals, and then outran the rest of the defense for a 58-yard touchdown.Cincinnati had one last possession, but its magic finally ran out when Flacco was intercepted on a Hail Mary attempt on the game’s final play. It was a true up-and-down fourth quarter for the Bears. Their win probability peaked at 99.7% and valleyed at 14.1% — an 85.6% swing. Ultimately, Chicago hung on to improve to 5-3, while the Bengals fell to 3-6. Rohan NadkarniRohan Nadkarni is a sports reporter for NBC News. 
October 26, 2025
NBA commissioner ‘deeply disturbed’ by gambling scandal
October 17, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleOct. 17, 2025, 11:34 AM EDTBy Rebecca CohenCustomers of the athletic shoe company On have filed a class action lawsuit alleging that some of the brand’s sneakers squeak embarrassingly loudly when they walk.The class action suit, filed in the U.S. district court in Portland — where On’s U.S. headquarters is located — on October 9, targets On’s shoes made with “CloudTec” technology. A hallmark of many of the brand’s styles, “CloudTec” is composed of differently shaped holes that cover the external and bottom surfaces of the shoes, according to the lawsuit. At least 11 of On’s sneaker styles are referenced in the lawsuit, including the Cloud 5 and Cloud 6, CloudMonster, and Cloudrunner, among others. Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A representative for On said the company does not comment on ongoing legal matters. According to the lawsuit, “CloudTec” was created to “provide cushioned support when wearers land.” But according to plaintiffs, the technology “rubs together” when wearers walk or run, “causing a noisy and embarrassing squeak with each and every step.” The lawsuit, however, admits that while the squeaky shoes are “seemingly inconsequential,” the company has allegedly refused to provide refunds to those who are unhappy with their sneakers, leaving customers with “no relief after buying almost $200 shoes they can no longer wear without their doing significant DIY modifications to the shoe.” “No reasonable consumer would purchase Defendant’s shoes — or pay as much for them as they did — knowing each step creates an audible and noticeable squeak,” the lawsuit states. Nurses and those who are on their feet all day “bear the brunt of this defect,” the suit argues, which allegedly causes “issues for consumers in their daily lives.” According to the lawsuit, complaints about the squeaking have been widespread and documented on TikTok and Reddit, where customers share “DIY” remedies for the noisy shoes, including rubbing coconut oil on the soles or sprinkling baby powder inside the sneaker. The lawsuit alleges the company is aware of its squeaky sneakers, but its warranty does not cover reports of noisy soles as On characterizes them as “normal wear and tear,” and has stated in online comments that “squeaking isn’t currently classified as a production defect.” The lawsuit also alleges that the company can better make its products to avoid squeakiness, but that On has “done nothing” to remedy the issue. Plaintiffs allege they have suffered an “ascertainable loss” due to fraudulent business practices and a “deceptive marketing scheme,” and are seeking “compensatory, statutory, and punitive damages” as well as refunds on their squeaky sneakers. Rebecca CohenRebecca Cohen is a breaking news reporter for NBC News Digital.
October 25, 2025
Hurricane Melissa to bring 'catastrophic' flooding
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved