• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Trump’s Middle East deal required high ‘intensity’

admin - Latest News - October 9, 2025
admin
24 views 30 secs 0 Comments



Secretary of State Marco Rubio talks about how President Trump’s deal for the Middle East came to be and how it “took a turn” at the United Nations General Assembly last month. Rubio says the deal “creates the conditions for Gaza to one day be a normal place again” and for “Israelis to be safe.”



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Trump: 'We're only cutting Democrat programs'
NEXT
Oct. 9, 2025, 1:08 PM EDTBy Jessica SherwoodPresident Donald Trump has announced that Israel and Hamas have agreed on the first phase of a ceasefire deal — but there are significant lingering questions about what the 20-point plan will mean for the future of the Gaza Strip.“This means that ALL of the Hostages will be released very soon, and Israel will withdraw their Troops to an agreed upon line as the first steps toward a Strong, Durable, and Everlasting Peace,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.What is Trump’s proposed plan?Key components of Trump’s proposal include: The release of all living and dead hostages in Gaza within 72 hours of Israel accepting the agreement.Once all hostages are released, Israel will release 250 life-sentence prisoners plus 1,700 Palestinians detained after Oct. 7, 2023.A requirement for Hamas to lay down its arms, and a withdrawal of Israeli troops from the territory.The delivery of humanitarian aid and the installation of a civilian governing authority for Palestinians.Secretary of State Marco Rubio speaks to President Donald Trump during a roundtable discussion at the White House on Wednesday.Anna Moneymaker / Getty ImagesWhat happens next?The Israel Defense Forces said Thursday that they were moving to “adjusted deployment lines soon” but warned that parts of Gaza were still a “dangerous combat zone.”But a ceasefire would take effect in Gaza “within 24 hours” of a government meeting set for Thursday evening, a spokesperson for the Israeli prime minister’s office told reporters.Following that 24-hour period, a 72-hour window would open in which Hamas would release the remaining hostages. Earlier, the White House said it expected hostages to be released Monday. Forty-eight hostages remain to be returned, of which Israel says it believes 20 are still alive.An Israeli official briefed on the matter told NBC News that all living hostages would be released at one time.People react at Hostage Square in Tel Aviv on Thursday following news of a new Gaza ceasefire deal.Maya Levin / AFP via Getty ImagesThe agreement comes almost two years to the day after the Hamas-led terrorist attacks on Israel that killed 1,200 people. Since then, Israel has killed more than 67,000 people in Gaza, according to the Palestinian health ministry.Gaza’s future?The first phase of Trump’s plan does not address Gaza’s medium- and long-term future. With most of Gaza’s buildings damaged or destroyed in Israel’s offensive, according to the United Nations, and its population largely forced from their homes, what comes next is an urgent question.Trump’s plan says the enclave should be temporarily governed by a “technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee” overseen by a “Board of Peace” led by Trump and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair.That is until the Palestinian Authority, which controls part of the occupied West Bank and is the Palestinians’ main representative internationally, can be “reformed,” according to the plan.Meanwhile, Hamas has agreed to participate in the hostage and prisoner exchange but has not said it will disarm and disband — a key stipulation of Trump’s proposal.Smoke rises from southern Gaza following Israeli airstrikes in Deir al-Balah on Thursday.Ali Jadallah / Anadolu via Getty ImagesJessica SherwoodJessica Sherwood is a social editor based in NBC News’ London bureau.Matt Bradley contributed.
Related Post
November 5, 2025
NTSB says footage shows left engine detaching from wing during takeoff before deadly UPS crash
October 19, 2025
Oct. 19, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Peter Guo and Jennifer JettHONG KONG — For years, pro-Beijing lawmakers in Hong Kong have been steadfastly in support of the government. That is, until the issue of same-sex partnerships came up.Last month, Hong Kong’s opposition-free Legislative Council overwhelmingly voted down a government-sponsored bill that would have partially recognized same-sex unions in the Chinese territory.The rejection, which LGBTQ rights advocates said was “disappointing,” has rekindled discussions about gay rights and the rule of law in Hong Kong as its leaders grow more in sync with the central Chinese government.The bill, which would have granted limited rights to same-sex couples, was a response to a 2023 order by Hong Kong’s top court that gave the government until Oct. 27, 2025, to establish an alternative framework for legal recognition of same-sex partnerships, such as registered civil partnerships or civil unions.Marriage equality remains a work in progress in Asia, with only three jurisdictions — Taiwan, Nepal and Thailand — having fully legalized same-sex marriage. A 2023 survey of Hong Kong residents by the Chinese University of Hong Kong found that same-sex marriage was supported by about 60% of respondents.Though the Hong Kong legislation fell far short of fully recognizing same-sex marriage, equality campaigners said it still would have been a step forward for the international financial hub, whose global image has suffered greatly after mass anti-government protests, severe pandemic restrictions and a crackdown on dissent.Hong Kong lawmaker Maggie Chan giving a speech last month in front of a sign that reads “Resolutely Oppose Registration of Same-Sex Partnerships Bill.”Chan Long Hei / APHowever, 71 out of 86 lawmakers opposed the bill, with some blasting it as an attack on marriage and traditional Chinese values.The veto marked the legislature’s first big split with the government since Beijing’s “patriots-only” electoral reform in 2021, which aimed to ensure “consistent” and “strong” legislative support for the executive after the 2019 protests. The changes have essentially shut out the pro-democracy lawmakers who traditionally challenged the government.The Hong Kong government said it was “disappointed” by the veto but that it would respect the legislature’s decision and turn to administrative means to protect the rights of gay couples. The details of its next steps are not immediately clear.‘No enthusiasm’Hong Kong, a city of 7.5 million people, had been making some progress on LGBTQ rights through a string of court victories.In 2023, Hong Kong’s top court ruled that transgender people could change their gender on their official identity cards without undergoing full sex reassignment surgery. In July, a Hong Kong court ruled that transgender people have the right to use public toilets in line with their affirmed genders.And last month, a Hong Kong judge ruled in favor of a lesbian couple who wanted to include both mothers’ names on their son’s birth certificate.But there have also been setbacks as the space for activism in Hong Kong has diminished. Pink Dot, the city’s largest LGBTQ event, said last month that it was holding its 2025 edition online after losing its usual venue with no explanation.The case that prompted the same-sex marriage legislation was brought in 2018 by Jimmy Sham, a leading local gay rights activist who took the government to the Court of Final Appeal to have his overseas same-sex marriage recognized.Gay rights activist Jimmy Sham in front of the Court of Final Appeal in Hong Kong in August.Chan Long Hei / APThe 2023 court ruling in his favor came while Sham, 38, one of 47 pro-democracy figures arrested in 2021 under a Beijing-imposed national security law, was on trial on subversion charges. Sham, who like most of the defendants pleaded guilty, was released from prison in May after serving more than four years.To comply with the landmark ruling, the Hong Kong government proposed a mechanism in July by which gay couples could visit their partners in the hospital, access their medical records and make decisions about organ donation and funeral arrangements. It did not address parental or adoption rights.The protections also would have applied only to same-sex couples who had registered their partnerships outside Hong Kong, a provision that advocacy groups criticized as discriminatory.Yet the proposal met with strong objections from lawmakers, who cited a “lack of social consensus” in Hong Kong on the “highly controversial” subject of same-sex partnership.They argued that the bill, even though it did not legalize gay marriage, would still lead to a “collapse of traditional family ethics and values” if passed.LGBTQ couples at a mass wedding in Hong Kong in 2024, which a U.S. pastor performed online.Peter Parks / AFP via Getty Images file“Why stir up trouble and break tradition for a small group, throwing the whole society into turmoil?” said lawmaker Junius Ho, a vocal opponent of LGBTQ rights.Sham said that although the veto was a “great pity,” he hoped authorities would relaunch the legislative process. “The question is whether those in power have the courage and wisdom to resolve differences and seek consensus,” he wrote in a Facebook post.Hong Kong officials said the government had made its “best effort” to secure support from the legislature, basing the proposal on what they deemed “societal common ground.”However, John Burns, an emeritus professor at the University of Hong Kong who specializes in the city’s politics and governance, said he saw “no enthusiasm” from the government to create an alternative framework for recognizing same-sex partnerships.After being forced into action by the court, Burns said, the Hong Kong government “waited until virtually the last possible moment” before proposing a “minimalist bill.”“They had many opportunities to fix this, and they sat on their hands and looked at the sky,” he added.What’s nextThe Chinese central government and pro-Beijing lawmakers, who have denied any erosion of freedoms in Hong Kong, said the veto would not create a constitutional crisis but rather showcased the checks and balances of Hong Kong’s governance.But legal experts said the government still has to find a way to comply with the court order.“The legislature rushed through this decision,” said Azan Marwah, a Hong Kong barrister specializing in public law and family litigation.He said lawmakers should have proposed and debated amendments to the bill if they had concerns.“But instead of doing that, they simply abdicated their responsibility,” Marwah said. “Now, what will the court do? To be really frank with you, I don’t know.”The Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau, which proposed the failed legislation, did not respond to a request for comment.The lack of legal protections for same-sex couples may lead to a “big loss” of local or foreign talent in Hong Kong, as many multinational companies value diversity and equality, said Marie Pang, deputy secretary-general of the centrist political party Third Side.“It would directly undermine Hong Kong’s competitiveness as an international city, especially when other regions in Asia already have relevant systems in place,” Pang said.Amid the uncertainty, many people in Hong Kong’s LGBTQ community are continuing to look forward.The campaign for equality and inclusion is more than legal victories, said Louis Ng, a law student and gay rights advocate.“Real change requires open communication and engagement with all sides. Only then may we persuade the strong opponents,” Ng said. “It all takes time and effort.”Peter GuoPeter Guo is an associate producer based in Hong Kong.Jennifer JettJennifer Jett is the Asia Digital Editor for NBC News, based in Hong Kong.
October 20, 2025
Oct. 19, 2025, 11:34 PM EDTBy Dennis RomeroSAN DIEGO — The Marines Corps has launched an investigation after the California Highway Patrol said shrapnel from an artillery shell, fired during a live-fire demonstration touted by the White House, struck a law enforcement vehicle.No injuries were reported when an artillery round “detonated overhead prematurely” during Saturday’s 250th anniversary celebration for the Marines Corps at Camp Pendleton, the highway patrol said.But at least one of its patrol vehicles, on hand to help stop and divert traffic on Interstate 5 through the base during the demonstration, was damaged, the highway patrol said in a statement Sunday.“This was an unusual and concerning situation,” CHP Border Division Chief Tony Coronado, who also identified himself as a Marine, said in the statement. “It is highly uncommon for any live-fire or explosive training activity to occur over an active freeway.”Capt. Gregory Dreibelbis, spokesperson for I Marine Expeditionary Force, said in a statement Sunday that officials “are aware of the report of a possible airborne detonation of a 155mm artillery round outside the designated impact area” during Saturday’s Marine Corps amphibious capabilities demonstration.Pictures from a CHP incident report show a black-and-white unit with a hood apparently pierced by shrapnel, as well as multiple munition fragments. The report indicated that the fragment on the hood measured around 2 inches by 2 inches. According to a CHP map, the vehicle was at Interstate 5 and Las Pulgas Road, nearly a mile north of the Red Beach demonstration along the northernmost coast of San Diego County, when it was hit. The highway patrol said shrapnel from live artillery, fired over Interstate 5 as part of the anniversary demonstration, struck a patrol vehicle.California Highway PatrolThe report said a motorcycle officer also found a fragment measuring about 1 inch by a half-inch near his own vehicle. The CHP said the strike happened as officers were temporarily halting traffic on the freeway so motorists would be out of harm’s way during the demonstration.California Gov. Gavin Newsom had been critical of the plan to fire live munitions over the interstate in the days leading up to Saturday’s celebrations, which were attended by Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who both gave spoke at the event. Newsom, a Democrat who has repeatedly sparred with the Trump administration, had criticized the potential impact of a temporary closure of the 80,000-vehicles-per-day Interstate 5, and he said state authorities were denied sufficient notice of a dangerous and “absurd show of force.”“This could have killed someone,” Newsom said Sunday on X.Asked for a response to the CHP’s report of a shrapnel strike, Newsom spokesperson Diana Crofts-Pelayo also pointed to a post on the X account for the governor’s office: “We love our Marines and owe a debt of gratitude to Camp Pendleton, but next time, the Vice President and the White House shouldn’t be so reckless with people’s lives for their vanity projects.”The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment Sunday. In the lead-up to Saturday’s celebrations, officials within the Trump administration had characterized complaints about the live-fire demonstrations and consequent freeway shutdown as an overreaction. “Gavin Newsom wants people to think this exercise is dangerous,” William Martin, Vance’s communications director, said in a statement to The New York Times. “The Marine Corps says it’s an established and safe practice. Newsom wants people to think this is an absurd show of force. The Marine Corps says it’s part of routine training at Camp Pendleton.”Dreibelbis, the Marine spokesman, said safety protocols were observed.“The demonstration went through a rigorous safety evaluation, and deliberate layers of redundancy, to ensure the safety of fellow citizens,” he said, adding that live fire was suspended Saturday in accordance with safety protocols. The CHP said it wants to conduct a review and create better communication with federal officials. Dreibelbis said the Marine Corps has launched an investigation and wants to learn from the incident, as well.”We are committed to determining the incident’s root cause and applying findings to future missions,” he said.Dennis RomeroDennis Romero is a breaking news reporter for NBC News Digital.Elyse Perlmutter-Gumbiner, Bill Feather and Madeline Morrison contributed.
October 30, 2025
Bovino facing scrutiny for immigration crackdown
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved